BB
Browne B

1 reviews | Active since Nov 2020

08 Oct 2024, 05:33

Stark borehole

Unfavourable experience: 1. Paid for a service(borehole drilling) 2. Borehole collapsed by one of their employees 3. Sent another quote for over 200k (their solution)to fix the issue their employee created by collapsing the borehole, damaging the piping and pump 4. Left the premises without discussing with property owner 5. Website stated and still states to this day 100% success rate - marketing is inaccurate in this case

0
Replies (3)
Stark Boreholes
Stark Boreholes's reply08 Oct 2024, 12:54
Official
We understand your concerns and appreciate the chance to address them. Dated June 2023 old ongoing complaint.

Before we began the work, the drilling contract was signed which outlined the risks involved with borehole drilling. We explained that there’s always a chance of encountering unstable subsurface formations, which can only be detected during the drilling exploration process. These conditions can cause problems, including borehole collapse as soon as the rods are retrieved after successful drilling of the borehole. 

During the project, we successfully struck water, but the ground proved unstable, and despite our best efforts, the borehole collapsed right after rods was retrieved, making it impossible to even try to install the pvc sleeves and more impossible to install a borehole pump.

Drilling contract was explained, accepted and signed, risk involved, accepted the drilling quote, and settled the initial drilling costs after informed of the borehole collapse because of unstable formation.

We offered to drill using the Odex Drilling method , as explained on both quote and drilling contract that was signed, based on a new quote on which we received a reply - to expensive to continue.

ODEX (Overburden Drilling Exocentric) drilling is required when normal percussion drilling is impossible.

This technique uses steel casing to protect the borehole and is suited for unstable formations like yours, though it is a much more expensive option.
You decided not to proceed with ODEX drilling. 

We respect your decision not to proceed with this option.
BB
Browne B's update08 Oct 2024, 13:24
Reviewer Update
A functional borehole has been established on the property at a fraction of the cost, without the inclusion of additional features, and using standard precision drilling (no ODEX drilling was necessary) However, the drilling method you recommended was projected to exceed the cost of installing a new borehole, raising concerns about the financial feasibility of your assessment in this regard. Your statement suggests that the results fell short of expectations and the fact that a borehole was drilled using standard drilling indicates the claim of 100% success should be retracted from the website as it is misleading. Furthermore, your employee’s action in collapsing the borehole (as witnessed) and leaving the site without offering a thorough explanation to the property owner will remain unsatisfactory. Overall, the service rendered and lack of compromise failed to meet the expected standard.
Stark Boreholes
Stark Boreholes's reply08 Oct 2024, 14:45
Official
In terms of our success rate:
We qualify the statement on our website as the follows: “ Once we have found water using our advanced water survey machines we have a 100% strike rate when it comes to drilling for water.” This is still accurate since we did find water on your property.

Regarding the borehole collapsing:
We dispute your assertion that our employees collapsed borehole. When our team retrieved the drilling rods the borehole collapsed due to unstable underground formations. 
As mentioned before, we made the risks abundantly clear to you prior to drilling. Which you signed and accepted prior to drilling.