Clarification Required on Assessment Discrepancies

I am writing to request urgent feedback regarding multiple discrepancies identified in the final assessment submitted to RMA. Firstly, there are no ICD-10 codes recorded for the documented nerve damage as reflected in the nerve conduction (EMG) report. The Occupational The******’s report clearly outlines limited range of motion in all limbs, loss of strength and sensation, and makes specific reference to nerve damage. None of these findings are reflected in the final assessment. Secondly, the ICD-10 code used for the fracture is incorrect. According to the Section 91 form, the upper end of the humerus was fractured, yet the assessment lists a fracture of the lower end of the humerus. It is also unclear why the medical reports submitted to RMA were not incorporated into the final assessment. The EMG report, which was less than 12 months old at the time of assessment, should have been valid and considered. Both the nerve damage and loss of range of motion in multiple limbs were clearly documented in the EMG and Occupational Therapy reports but were excluded from the final findings. All relevant reports were received by RMA and were referenced in email correspondence with Vuyo Msuthu, yet there is no indication that they were taken into account. I therefore request a comprehensive explanation for the above omissions and an updated review of the assessment to accurately reflect all available medical evidence.