NS
Nicoleen S

1 reviews | Active since Aug 2013

23 Aug 2018, 11:49

The ombudsman is *******!

The ombudsman is totally ******* and biased to the insurance companies. I'm sure there a lot of bribery and *******ion happening in that department. The report I received yesterday from them only make mention what Old Mutual says, nothing about my concerns or my inputs. How is that fair? They are so pathetic, don't even know why they exist! This is pure *******ion, how can a "fair" report only include one side to the story??? I'm sure you get regular bribes from Old Mutual since you always in contact with them, and you hear from us only once, so we mean nothing to you. Guess no one will shut the hand that feeds them.

0
Replies (2)
Ombudsman for Short Term Insurance
Ombudsman for Short Term Insurance's reply27 Aug 2018, 10:41
Official

Dear Nicoleen

Your allegations that the ombudsman's office is ******* and bribed by the insurer are not only offensive, but untrue and baseless. The ombudsman is appointed to serve the interest of both the insuring public and short-term insurers. The ombudsman takes its role as an impartial and independent forum very seriously and deals with each complaint that is lodged with it in this way.

You have not provided a reference number for your matter with us and I can therefore not comment of the merits. However, any ruling made by the Ombudsman is not binding on you the insured. Therefore, if you are not happy with this office's decision, you are still free to look for other ways to continue to challenge the insurer’s decision.

Yours faithfully,
AYANDA MAZWI
Senior Assistant Ombudsman

NS
Nicoleen S's update27 Aug 2018, 11:29
Reviewer Update
It is not baseless. They why would you only include the insurer's view in your report? Not even one of my points were address. Why???? My case number is M1089/18B. I have also report this in the survey link you have sent to us after the report because it's your normal standard. I'm sure you don't even look at people's feedback, because its only there for process purposes, otherwise I would have received a call from you a long time ago to address my unhappiness with the outcome and concerns that the report is clearly one-sided and not fair.