DP
Donovan P
1 reviews | Active since Aug 2014
12 Sept 2019, 18:33
MTN allowing ******* port requests
MTN has somwhow allowed a port request on my phone number - do they even check the documents they are provided with? I see I'm not the only one having this issue with MTN. Can I find out which branch allowed this to happen and if it is a common occurrence there?
Helpful (0)
Replies (1)0
Replies (1)DP
Donovan P's updateReviewer Update
25 Sept 2019, 14:12Update:
It was relatively painless to reverse except for needing to get a new sim card with previous provider.
Just a thought, could you not a use one time pin when porting a number (and with other things). So when someone tries to port a number the one time pin is sent to that number and needs to be filled in on the system as authorisation?
Seems like that extra layer of security would stop a lot of these issues.
It was relatively painless to reverse except for needing to get a new sim card with previous provider.
Just a thought, could you not a use one time pin when porting a number (and with other things). So when someone tries to port a number the one time pin is sent to that number and needs to be filled in on the system as authorisation?
Seems like that extra layer of security would stop a lot of these issues.
DP
Donovan P's update25 Sept 2019, 14:12
Reviewer Update
Update:
It was relatively painless to reverse except for needing to get a new sim card with previous provider.
Just a thought, could you not a use one time pin when porting a number (and with other things). So when someone tries to port a number the one time pin is sent to that number and needs to be filled in on the system as authorisation?
Seems like that extra layer of security would stop a lot of these issues.
It was relatively painless to reverse except for needing to get a new sim card with previous provider.
Just a thought, could you not a use one time pin when porting a number (and with other things). So when someone tries to port a number the one time pin is sent to that number and needs to be filled in on the system as authorisation?
Seems like that extra layer of security would stop a lot of these issues.