1 reviews | Active since May 2014

21 Apr 2022, 13:06

Optometry Administration: newpark,@mellins.co.zallins

An Enigma worth sharing: Who comes first , egg or the chicken?

Having admitted to serving a Fund member with an erroneous quotation and having it rejected by the Fund , caused this dispute. Both Server and Member are in possession of Fund's remittance stating what it's obligation and member's excess dues are. Based on the fact that the Fund states Zero excess payment by the Member and Spouse, an appended quotation was requested prior to Collection , with additional excess included. The service provider rejects this ethical request out of hand by replying they will do so only after acknowledging the Funds remittance in their account! In the mean time the goods have not been delivered.

0
Replies (2)
Mellins i.Style
Mellins i.Style's reply21 Apr 2022, 14:25
Official
Good day Edward, thank you for sharing this. Would you mind sending this to *** so that we can contact you directly to resolve this? Kind regards Mellins Customer Care

's update22 Apr 2022, 11:55
Reviewer Update
So this Mellins Enigma continues.As the member cannot decode or copy and paste encoded contact information supp**** in the servers reply,it is suggested that this odious matter be settled asap by higher authority!