ANOTHER THING COMING...

<p>I took out insurance on my 2016 ford ecosport on 7 Feb 2017 whilst it was still at the dealership. Four weeks later and bam an accident, hit from the back by a driver who was clearly not paying any attention to the road. I had submitted the claim to kingprice and after a week it was rejected on the basis of me being "dishonest"</p> <p>Firstly I was sent a transcript of the call, it is dated 25 January 2017 which is for a different vehicle I had planned to buy, this is *****. Kingprice is using this invalid transcript to say I'm a ****. this transcript dated 25 January was for a totally different vehicle and therefore irrelevant to this claim. I was that transcript dated 7 Feb 2017 which pertains to the vehicle I own.</p> <p>Secondly the claim was rejected because I apparently said yes when asked if I was the regular driver, to the layman never having insurance before regular driver to me means a person who drives the vehicle regularly. I was never explained what regular driver means. Had it been explained I would have said no my father is the owner and regular driver and I drive the vehicle regularly with his permission and his outsurance comprehensive cover allowed for this. </p> <p> </p> <p>Lastly the rejection letter stated I was dishonest which is defamation of character. Kingprice is using a recording unrelated to thus vehicle to reject my claim and call me dishonest.</p>