Claim rejection with unfounded reasons

<p>My vehicle was impound by AFU whilst or before due to a 3rd party major malicious sabotage damage was sustained all supporting documentation was submited by myself and AFU to the insurance company. Upon collecting the vehicle it was discovered that petrol had been put into the vehicle instead of diesel causing major motor damage imcluding sound system theft. The reasons for claim being rejected wear and tear i find it very difficult to understand there reasoning as it is clear from the police report that a clear case of sabotage has taken place. It would seem that Hollard is trying any and all tactics not to honour the claim.</p>