1 reviews | Active since Nov 2017
DebtBusters – Clearance certificate delayed due to lack of response and process clarity
I am a former DebtBusters client whose credit providers have been settled in full. I requested a clearance certificate in January 2026 and submitted all documentation required from my side.
Since then, I have engaged repeatedly and constructively via email and telephone. However, I have experienced ongoing delays and a lack of clear ownership in resolving the request.
Specifically: ● On 18 January 2026, I requested clarification on the contractual and regulatory basis for a clearance certificate fee being requested.
● I also requested a copy of my original debt counselling agreement from 2019, including the clauses re**** upon for the fee and how it is determined.
● On 23 January 2026, I submitted the outstanding documentation requested and asked for confirmation of receipt.
● On 26 January 2026, during a telephonic discussion, I was advised that my query had been escalated internally and that I would receive a callback from a team leader within 48 hours.
As at today, I have not received the promised callback, nor written responses addressing:
● Acknowledgement of documents received
● Provision of the original agreement and fee clauses re**** upon
● Clarification of the regulatory basis for the clearance certificate fee
● An update on a POPIA request for access to call recordings
I am not disputing that administrative work may be required. I am simply seeking transparent communication, confirmation of the contractual basis for the fee, and reasonable timelines so that the matter can be brought to a close.
I would appreciate engagement from DebtBusters management to assist in resolving this matter.
DebtBusters has since responded via email. However, the response has raised further concerns rather than resolving the matter.
- A new clearance certificate fee has now been introduced, calculated as 75% of the original restructuring fee, which differs from the R3,500 “standard clearance certificate fee” that was formally invoiced to me on 12 January 2026.
- No explanation has been provided for this discrepancy, nor has the earlier invoice been withdrawn.
- The response refers to NCR withdrawal guidelines as justification, but no attachment was included, making it impossible to assess the provisions re**** upon.
- My request for access to call recordings under POPIA was declined on the basis of “internal policy / intellectual property,” without reference to the statutory grounds for refusal.
DebtBusters has since responded via email. However, the response has raised further concerns rather than resolving the matter.
- A new clearance certificate fee has now been introduced, calculated as 75% of the original restructuring fee, which differs from the R3,500 “standard clearance certificate fee” that was formally invoiced to me on 12 January 2026.
- No explanation has been provided for this discrepancy, nor has the earlier invoice been withdrawn.
- The response refers to NCR withdrawal guidelines as justification, but no attachment was included, making it impossible to assess the provisions re**** upon.
- My request for access to call recordings under POPIA was declined on the basis of “internal policy / intellectual property,” without reference to the statutory grounds for refusal.
Since DebtBusters’ initial response, the matter has not progressed and several commitments have not been honoured.
During a telephonic discussion on Tuesday, 3 February 2026, I requested escalation to a team leader due to unresolved issues. I was advised that the matter would be escalated and that I would be contacted by one of two team leaders within three business days.
As at the close of business on Friday, 7 February 2026, being the third business day following that discussion, no such contact has occurred.
In addition, the following remain unresolved:
- Two different clearance-related fees are on record (a R3,500 fee formally invoiced on 12 January 2026, and a later assertion of a 75% restructuring fee), without reconciliation or withdrawal of the earlier invoice.
- My file suspension is being treated as a “withdrawal” for fee purposes, despite the absence of my original signed debt counselling agreement, which has not yet been produced.
- A POPIA request for access to call recordings has been declined on the basis of “internal policy / intellectual property,” without reference to the statutory grounds re**** upon.
Since DebtBusters’ initial response, the matter has not progressed and several commitments have not been honoured.
During a telephonic discussion on Tuesday, 3 February 2026, I requested escalation to a team leader due to unresolved issues. I was advised that the matter would be escalated and that I would be contacted by one of two team leaders within three business days.
As at the close of business on Friday, 7 February 2026, being the third business day following that discussion, no such contact has occurred.
In addition, the following remain unresolved:
- Two different clearance-related fees are on record (a R3,500 fee formally invoiced on 12 January 2026, and a later assertion of a 75% restructuring fee), without reconciliation or withdrawal of the earlier invoice.
- My file suspension is being treated as a “withdrawal” for fee purposes, despite the absence of my original signed debt counselling agreement, which has not yet been produced.
- A POPIA request for access to call recordings has been declined on the basis of “internal policy / intellectual property,” without reference to the statutory grounds re**** upon.
