1 reviews | Active since Jan 2018
ITS A DELICT AND NOT A CREDIT ARRANGEMENT
PLEASE NOTE THAT EVERYTHING I SAY I HAVE PROOF OFF AND PHOTOS.. ON 10/1/2012 I REVERSED INTO A PARKED VEHICLE BEHIND ME IN THE MAKRO VAN DER BIJL PARK PARKING LOT. AND BECAUSE IAM AN HONEST PERSON I GAVE MY NAME AND CONTACT NUMBER TO THE CAR ATTENDANT TO GIVE TO THE DRIVER OF THE CAR. A LADY BY THE NAME OF CHRISTA VAN WYK PHONED ME BACK. I GAVE HER ALL THE INFO SHE NEEDED TO HAVE THE DAMAGES FIXED. I EMAILED A SCETCH AND INFO REGARDING THE ACCIDENT TO MY BROKER LENA DELPORT AT ABSA BANK THREE RIVERS. CHRISTA PHONED ME A FEW TIMES AGAIN FOR MORE INFO. HER NUMBER AT THE TIME WAS ********** 244 - RESIDING AT 27 EUGENE MARAIS STREET SASOLBURG FREE STATE. LENA DELPORT PHONED ME A FEW MONTHS AFTER THE ACCIDENT STATING THAT SHE IS STILL WAITING FOR CHRISTA TO CONTACT HER REGARDING INFO SHE NEEDED. ON THE 12/12/2013 I RECEIVED A SUMMONS FROM A JOHANNES VAN WYK ID ********** 079080 FOR R8284.68 FROM DE KLERK, VERMAAK&PARTNERS REF Z14396/GERDA MEYER, JOHANNES VAN WYK STATED IN THE SUMMONS “THAT I WAS OUT OF CONTROL AND WAS SPEEDING RECKLESSLY AROUND A CORNER AT MAKRO AND COULDN’T EVEN PUT ON BRAKES AND COLLIDED WITH HIS VEHICLE. HOW COULD HE **** OPENLY ABOUT THIS. IN SHOCK I EMAILED LENA DELPORT THE SUMMONS AND SHE ASURED ME THAT HER ABSA ATTORNEYS WOULD SORT THIS OUT FOR ME. AS THIS WAS NOT MY FAULT BUT THEIRS. HER P.A. MART MARIE WAS HANDLING ALL THE CLAIMS AT THAT TIME. I LEFT IT WITH LENA AND BELIEVED THAT THIS WAS SORTED OUT FOR GOOD. ON 30/5/2014 A DEFAULT JUDGEMENT WAS ISSUED IN MY NAME, I NEVER RECEIVED ANY DOCUMENTATION ON THE JUDGEMENT AND ONLY FOUND THIS OUT WHEN I WANTED TO UPGRADE MY CONTRACTS IN JUNE 2016. MY ATTORNEY CONTACTED THE PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEY BOTHA&SUTHERLAND. REF A. OPPERMAN/KM/ZUR1962 REGARDING THE JUDGEMENT. WHICH WAS ENTERED AGAINST MN CLARKE BY DEFAULT IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT, THEREFOR CONSTITUTES A DELICT AND NOT A CREDIT ARRANGEMENT IN TERMS OF A DELICT CANNOT BE EXTENDED ON A CREDIT REPORT. THIS JUDGEMENT COULDN’T BE REMOVED BY ITC BECAUSE THEY NEEDED A LETTER FROM THE PLAINTIFF. AFTER NUMEROUS LETTERS AND CORRESPONDENCE , ON 30/3/2017 MY ATTORNEY CONTACTED BOTHA&SUTHERLAND AND MADE THEM AN ONCE OFF OFFER TO SETTLE THE ENTIRE DEBT ON CONDITION THAT THEIR CLIENT AGREES TO CONSENT THAT THE ITC ENTRY BE DELETED FROM THE SYSTEM AS THE DEBT OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF A DELICT. BOTHA&SUTHERLANDS CLIENT AGREED TO CONSENT THAT THE JUDGEMENT AT ITC BE DELETED FROM THE SYSTEM AS THE DEBT ACURED AS A RESULT OF A DELICT AND NOT A CREDIT ARRANGEMENT. UP TO NOW IAM STILL WAITING FOR BOTHA&SUTHERLAND TO GIVE ME THE LETTER. THEY REFUSED AS THEY WANTED PAYMENT UP FRONT. KNOWING THAT THEIR CLIENT THE PLAINTIFF ALREADY **** IN HIS AFFIDAVIT WE REALISE THAT THEY WILL TAKE THE PAYMENT AND NOT GIVE ME THE LETTER. I FEEL THAT MY CREDIT REPUTATION HAVE BEEN BADLY HARMED BY THIS DELICT JUDGEMENT AND THAT THE PLAINTIFF IS AS MUCH TO BLAME BECAUSE CHRISTA OR (HE) NEVER CONTACTED ME OR LENA REGARDING HER OR (HIS) CLAIM. I HEREBY DEMAND BOTHA&SUTHERLAND’S CLIENT JOHANNES VAN WYK TO GIVE ME THE LETTER OF CONSENT TO HAVE THIS DELICT DELETED FROM THE SYSTEM AND HAVE MY CREDIT AND MY NAME RESTORED AT ITC
