Contract, issue MF65M router instead of MF910

R99 data contract 5 giga + 15 giga package.<br> My son in law app**** {02Apr16} and was issued with a ZTE M910 router and myself was issued {06Apr16} with a ZTE M65 Mi-Fi router for the same monthly installment. It is unacceptable to issue one customer with a better product than the other one for the same amount. The value and function between the two routers differ but Cell C expects the public to pay the same amount. During purchasing the consultant explained to me that the M910 router is out of stock and if I am willing to take the M65 which I accepted. It was after wards that I recognize that I will pay the same as my son in law but will have the down grade router instead of the one that was advertised. I contacted the Cell-C to provide me with the correct router {M910}, but was unsuccessful, reason is that I already signed and accepted the contract / router. I discussed the option of cancelling the contract, but according to Cell C I do not have a valued reason to cancel, I will have to pay the full contract up front without benefit anything. I do not have a problem with the contract itself but the issue of receiving a cheaper router. I expect Cell C to issue me with the MF910.