AI
ARI I

1 reviews | Active since Apr 2021

29 Jan 2024, 20:13

Speaking up/out to be a catalyst for change

Going to a “private” institution you would ultimately expect a certain standard of service. There were numerous emails going back and forth with Boston. Trying to get my PRL sorted. They sent me 4 different documents all contradicting the previous decision on the review or subjects being omitted.

Then issued with incorrect text books + textbooks for certain modules not being given to you until a month or 2 later! Invigilator app not being able to scan your answer script and having unending technical issues.

Every semester there was an issue with their invigilator app. Matthew the deputy registrar responses are always text book responses, without considering or applying logic. Which results in re-writes Mind you there Is a student who paid 18K for re-writes. Wrote an exam - on the cover sheet of the exam it states: no answers in pencil will be marked. I typed my answers and upload it. My result ZERO - exam irregularity.

Forced to write the supp exam. A carbon copy of the initial exam! Only 2 questions differ. After reviewing my answer scripts for both it’s as clear as day the same person wrote it due to the consistency. On the student portal the Monday. My result is released 65% for the auditing exam.

A few moments later… an email, exam irregularity detected. I was apparently out of the invigilator app for 25mins and COULD/MAY have accessed unauthorised material = My result removed from the student portal Really? For an exam I’ve literally already written before! When I have 2 cellphones and my laptop where If I wanted to, could have accessed material on either. Make it make sense! After pleading with them to mark my initial script because I was well pre-pared for the exam. Nope! I had to re-write. Why on earth would any reasonable or idiot without ethics go and cheat on an exam they’ve already written. When they pleaded for their script to be marked! And they get the opportunity to do the exact same exam AGAIN! Why on such a perfect opportunity would a student exit an app on the exact same phone! And not use any of the 2 devices.

There has been NUMEROUS complaints about this app. It’s really suspicious that students are suspected to be out of the app when there’s no actual proof of evidence that they have in fact “minimised” or “left the app” besides for a invigilator app stating you exited at x time and signed back in at x time. It’s your word against a problematic application.

I urge students to think very carefully and conduct thorough research before registering with a university ESPECIALLY THIS ONE. It is extremely demotivating while preparing for an exam and writing an exam you need to be worried about an inefficient application. This institution really needs to relook at this app in its entirety, it’s not an effective tool. you can’t require students to use an application and play technical support at the same time while conducting an exam.

I sincerely hope that this dissatisfaction leads to improvement at this institution.

0
Replies (2)
Boston City Campus
Boston City Campus's reply30 Jan 2024, 08:56
Official
 Dear Ramiyah 

We acknowledge receipt of your review. Please be aware that we are currently investigating the matter and will provide you with feedback accordingly.

Kind Regards,
Team Boston 
Boston City Campus
Boston City Campus's reply30 Jan 2024, 10:29
Official
Dear Ramiyah, The Invigilation Application we use is a third-party application used by multiple similar institutions, both nationally and internationally. We have provided multiple live and recorded training sessions on the use of the application, as well as numerous guidelines and documents detailing how the application is to be utilised. In addition to this, the use of the application is voluntary. All students, in terms of the HE Invigilated Assessment Event Rules (“Rules”) may elect to be ‘invigilated’ (as defined in the Rules) either: 1) in-person at one of our 47 Support Centres across the country or 2) by using the Invigilator App. You elected the latter.   You received two assessment irregularities for breaching the Rules for the same module. The Rules were not only provided well ahead of the Summative Assessment window but were also attached to all Invigilated Assessment Events on ColCampus (i.e. these were available to you together with your question papers). When you breached the Rules for Summative Assessment 1, I responded in great detail, setting out the multiple communications we had with students regarding the Rules and reiterated that these rules are not new and highlighted how you have followed them in the past. In terms of your Summative Assessment 1, I again responded to your emails in detail and availed myself to schedule a telecom to discuss any questions you have regarding the Rules. To date, you have not responded to this. As an institution, it is our responsibility to create an environment where all students have an equal opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge and skills. Compliance with inter alia the Rules helps to ensure that all Invigilated Assessment Events are conducted consistently and objectively. Deviating from the Rules, even unintentionally, can compromise the integrity of the Assessment Event and potentially disadvantage other students. In the circumstances, I again conclude how I concluded my last email to you: “I recommend that you ensure that you are au fait with all the relevant rules, practices and procedures before participating in any further Invigilated Assessment Events. I am happy to arrange for a phone call once you have done so, if you have any questions and/or require any further clarity.” Kind Regards,Matthew de RoosDeputy Registrar: Academic