How a company fails it's service mandate

So following on.directly from the dynamics and challenges with the combined ADT/Fidelity Security being raised here as providing questionable ethics, I thought perhaps, as it now appears that the directors and management have decided I am claiming against the company for gain and indicate I have claimed for items that are not mine, so in retrospect, I am directly being caused of *****, whilst it has not been said, it has become amusing that after providing more documentation than needed to assist ADT with their investigation, that they are now deciding to distort the truth. Be careful, this is to anyone out there, it appears again that the company protects their negligence against claims, I mean a security company would.never make a mistake. It appears the company feels as if I am challenging their inability to act efficiently, after all, if you covering you tracks, you will want to blame the.people.claiming against you.....this company is sadly rather dishonest...I am.looking forward to disclosing all my documentation as advised by my lawyer....but ADT, it is time to take responsibility for your lack of commitment to acknowledging your errors.