SANTAM INSURANCE EXPOSURE AND MORE.

I refer to the following claim number at SANTAM INSURANCE PTY LTD ***.

I was a senior member of the Management Group at SANTAM INSURANCE.

TAKE NOTE I AM A WHISTLEBLOWER FROM SANTAM.

ON 10 NOV 2021, I STOPPED INDIVIDUALS IN SANTAM CLAIMS MANAGERS FROM APPOINTING BUDDY FOR BUDDY A POSITION AS MY EX-POSITION OF THE ASSESSOR'S MANAGER FOR ALL INLAND PROVINCES AND NAMIBIA, INCLUDUDING HEAVY HAULAGE, NOW CALLED THE CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE AND LEISURE. (BOATS, CARAVANS, CAMP TRAILERS, JET SKIS, ETC) THIS POSITION REQUIRED A PERSON WITH FULL TECHNICAL KNOWLEDGE OF TRUCKS, AGRI EQUIPMENT, YELLOW MACHINERY, ENGINES, GEARBOXES DIFFS, ELECTRICAL AND OTHER. I AM A CERTIFIED AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE ENGINEER AND FILIGHT ENGINEEER, WITH KNOWLEDGE ON TRUCKING ASSESSING, MECHANICAL FAILURE, COF, DRIVERS LICENECE CHECKS, MERITS, CLAIMS COMMITTE SPECIALIST, AMONGST MUCH OTHER.

ON 10 NOV 2021, I ****ED ON CERTAIN PEOPLES BATTERIES OF THE MOTOR CLAIMS DEPARTMENT, BUY THEIR IRREGULAR ACTIONS, UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE AND OTHER.

ON 11 NOVEMBER 2021, I WAS CALLED TO MEET WITH FORENSICS ON 12 NOVEMBER 2021.

I WAS ACCUSED OF A MATTER THAT HAD ALREADY EXONERATED ME, BY F**** COETZEE @ SANTAM.

WALDI ELS, ARRANGED ME TO BE DISMISSED BECAUSE I HAD RUINED HIS PLANS TO *******LY APPOINT HIS FRIEND INTO MY EX-POSITION, BEING ERASMUS MULLER. THERE ARE WITNESSES THAT KNOW WHAT OCCURRED AND THAT ERASMUS MULLER WAS STOPPED IN THE ******* ARRANGED APPOINTNTMENT AS ASSESSORS' MANAGER, AFTER I BECAME THE NATIONAL MODERATOR.

ON 12NOVEMBER 2021, I WAS TOLD I AM UNDER INVESTIGATION BY THE SO-CALLED DR JERRY CHETTY, HEAD OF ETHICS AND CHAIRMAN OF THE "ICFP'.

GOOGLE IT ON THE FOLLOWING LINK.

https://www.icfp.co.za/board-members/

HE IS THE A- HOLE IN THE TOP MIDDLE, BALD HEADED INDIAN MAN, THAT HAS NO ETHICS WHATSOVER AND THIS I WILL PROVE IN A COURT OF LAW.

BETWEEN HIM, WALDI ELS, SHARON MOODLEY, F**** COETZEE, ARRANGED MY FORCED DEPARTURE FROM SANTAM, FOR WHISTLE BLOWING AND INVESTIGATIONS INITIATED BY MYSELF.

NOW SANTAM IS ACTING ON THE MENTIONED CLAIM NUMBER, FOR AN A8 AUDI THAT IS WATER DAMAGED.

THE CLAIM WAS REJECTED AS I DID NOT REGISTER THE CLAIM IN THE POLICY 30 DAY PERIOD.

NOW IT MUST BE KNOWN THAT I WAS THE MOST SENIOR MEMBER OF THE HEAVY HAULAGE CLAIMS COMMITTEE AT SANTAM, BEFORE THEY *******LLY ARRANGED MY DISMISSAL, OR FORCED DEPARTURE.

IT IS NOT THE NEED OF A SCIENTEST TO KNOW THAT WHEN YOU ARE CHARGED AT A MAJOR CORPORATE AT SANTAM, YOU WILL GET DISMISSED NO MATTER WHAT, UNLESS YOU MANAGE SOME AGREEMENT IN ORDER TO PROTECT YOUR NAME.

ILEGALLY SUSPENDED ON 15 NOVEMBER 2021.

ON WATER DAMAGE CLAIMS ON VEHICLES, SANTAM WILL NORMALLY WRITE A VEHICLE OFF FOR WATER DAMAGE, MOST ESPECIALLY WHEN IT HAS REACHED THE ELECTRICS AND ELECTRONICS.

THE A8 SUNROOF WAS LEFT OPEN BY ACCIDENT, AND IT POURED WITH RAIN, WHICH OBVIOUSLY ENTERED THE VEHICLE.

BESIDES THAT, THERE WAS NO VISIBLE DAMGE TO THE VEHICLE AFTER THE WATER WAS DRIED UP AND LEFT IN THE SUN TO DRY OUT COMPLETELY.

AFTER APPROXIMATELY 3 MONTHS, THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT START, ALTHOUGH IT HAD NO ISSUES ON THE DAY IT RAINED INTO THE VEHICLE.

I AM NO EXPERT ON THIS VEHICLE, BUT DEFINATELY HAD NO IDEA THAT MANY OF THE VEHICLE CONTROL UNITS SIT UNDER THE CARPETS OF THE FOOT WELLS IN THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE.

IF THERE IS NO KNOWN DAMAGE, ANY REASONABLE PERSON WOULD NOT PLACE AN INSURANCE CLAIM IN, WHEN THERE IS NO KNOWN DAMAGE.

DAMAGE ONLY SURFACED A FEW MONTHS LATER, DESPITE WARNING THE BROKER OF A POSSIBLE CLAIM, BUT WE WOULD ONLY CLAIM IF I WAS NOT ABLE TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE, NOTING THAT MY 3 SONS ARE ALL QUALIFIED AUTO ELECTRICIANS ON CARS AND HEAVY HAULAGE..

HOWEVER, THE CAR IS ESSENTIALLY A WRITE OFF, BUT I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO BUY THE PARTS AT A GOOD PRICE, BUT DUE TO SANTAM INDIVIDUALS PERSISTENT VICTIMIZATION, APP**** THEIR UNPROFFESSIONAL. STANCE ON ME, AND FURTHER HAVE SLATED ME IN THE INDUSTRY, RUINING MY CARREER AND NOW BUSY PLAYING OUT IN THE HIGH COURT OF PRETORIA UNDER CASE NUMBER 010346/22, DECIDED TO REJECT THE CLAIM, DESPITE THE FACT THAT THAT THEY KNOWN THAT WATER DAMAGED VEHICLES GET WRITTEN OFF.

THERE IS NO MATERIAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE DATE OF LOSS, AND THE DATE THE CLAIM WAS REGISTERED.

I HAVE TAKEN THE MATTER TO THE OSTI, WHERE THEY HAVE DELIBERATELY FABRICATED THE FACTS OF THE MATTER AND HAS THUS RESULTED IN THE CLAIM NOT PAID TO DATE.

HOWEVER, I AM BUSY WITH THE OSTI, AND I HAVE ALL THE FACTS.

IF INDIVIDUALS DO NOT THINK THAT I WILL STAND MY GROUND IN FOR WHAT IS CORRECT, AND WHAT IS NOT CORRECT, HAVE MADE A SERIOUS MISCALCULATION OF MY STANDARDS, TCF, AND OTHER.

THEREFORE, I STATE THAT THE VEHICLE IN ESSENCE IS A WRITEOFF FROM THE DATE OF LOSS.

SANTAM INDIVIDUALS HAVE CREATED A SITUATION THAT HAS BROUGHT SANTAM INTO ILL REPUTE.

UNFORTUNATELY, WITH SANTAM BEING A GREAT COMPANY, THERE IS THE ARROGANCE OF IDIVIDUALS, THAT WILL CAUSE SANTAM TO GET ANOTHER ****** NOSE, JUST LIKE LIZE LAMPRECTS, EX CEO NOW, OF SANTAM, CAUSED A ****** NOSE TO THE BRAND OF SANTAM DURING THE POST PANDEMIC C19 BUSSINESS INTERUPTION CLAIMS.

I WILL BE GIVING THEM ANOTHER ONE.

THEN I REALLY HOPE THAT SANTAM TAKES HEED OF INDIVIDUALS THAT I HAVE MENTIONED AND THE OTHERS, TO HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ******* AND WRONGFULL ACTIONS, BRING THE SANTAM NAME INTO ILL REPUTE. . .