PJ
Patrick J

1 reviews | Active since Feb 2021

15 Apr 2026, 12:46

Concerns Regarding POLMED Medical Scheme

My recent experience with POLMED has raised serious concerns about the practical value of its benefits, particularly under the Aquarium package.

Despite a doctor’s clear recommendation for diagnostic imaging (X-rays and an ultrasound) following my daughter’s ankle injury, the claim was declined. The reason provided was that the diagnosis — classified as a sprain — did not meet the criteria for a Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) condition. As a result, essential radiology services were not covered.

This approach places members in a difficult position, where access to necessary medical investigations depends less on clinical judgment and more on whether a condition fits a predefined administrative category. It is concerning that even when a healthcare professional identifies the need for further examination, coverage may still be denied based on coding technicalities.

Furthermore, the suggestion that the diagnosis could be amended for reassessment — without any guarantee of payment — highlights an underlying issue: members may be required to navigate complex administrative processes rather than receive straightforward support during medical situations.

A medical scheme should provide reassurance and assistance when it is needed most. Unfortunately, this experience reflects a gap between expected support and actual service delivery.

Prospective members should carefully evaluate the limitations of the benefit structure and consider whether it aligns with their expectations for accessible and responsive healthcare coverage.

0
Replies (4)
Polmed
Polmed's reply15 Apr 2026, 13:12
Official
Hello  Patrick Julies,   
 
 Thank you for submitting a comment to us through Hello Peter. 
 
 As per the interaction with our representative, we hereby confirm that this matter has been attended to and will be resolved shortly.
 
 We apologise for any inconvenience caused to you. 
 
 Regards 
POLMED Team 
PJ
Patrick J's update16 Apr 2026, 15:51
Reviewer Update
The following claims have been declined as Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) as the primary ICD10 code submitted on the claims is not a PMB diagnosis and there you have it!!! if you considered polmed for medical care think twice.
PJ
Patrick J's update16 Apr 2026, 16:01
Reviewer Update
My recent experience with POLMED under the Aquarium package has revealed troubling gaps between promised benefits and actual support.When my daughter sustained an ankle injury, her doctor recommended diagnostic imaging (X-rays and an ultrasound). Despite the clear medical need, POLMED declined the claim. Their reasoning was that the diagnosis — classified as a sprain — did not qualify as a Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) condition.This decision illustrates a deeper issue: coverage is determined less by clinical judgment and more by rigid administrative coding. Even when a healthcare professional identifies the necessity of further investigation, members may be denied access to essential services simply because the condition doesn’t fit POLMED’s predefined categories.POLMED’s response to my appeal only reinforced this concern. They stated that the claims were declined because the ICD10 code submitted was not a PMB diagnosis. In other words, the scheme’s focus was on paperwork rather than patient care. The suggestion that the diagnosis could be amended for reassessment — without any guarantee of payment — places members in an uncomfortable position of navigating bureaucracy instead of receiving straightforward medical support.A medical aid should provide reassurance in times of need. Instead, this experience highlights a system where members must fight through technicalities to access care.Key Takeaways
  • Rigid benefit rules: Coverage depends on coding, not medical necessity.
  • Administrative burden: Members may be asked to resubmit or amend diagnoses with no cer*****y of approval.
  • Gap in support: The scheme’s processes prioritize compliance over patient well-being.
Final ThoughtProspective members should carefully evaluate whether POLMED’s benefit structure aligns with their expectations for accessible, responsive healthcare. If you value straightforward support during medical emergencies, you may want to think twice before joining.
Polmed
Polmed's reply21 Apr 2026, 08:56
Official
Hello Patrick Julies,    Thank you for submitting a comment to us through Hello Peter.  As per the interaction with our representative, we hereby confirm that this matter has now been resolved. POLMED strives to give the best customer service to our clients and appreciate it when you bring your concerns to us as to when we have failed to deliver this service.  We apologise for any inconvenience caused to you.  Regards  POLMED Team