Maverick Master.

I addressed a tentative, preliminary, and private enquiry to the Master, to raise concerns about an Executor. The Master, without question, copied this to all, opening everything up carelessly and prematurely. The Master further admitted evidence to their office which appeared to fall far below the standards of proof, or the requirements of law. A discussion needs to be conducted in a predictable manner, where the ground rules are clear. While I do not know the legal implications, I am distressed, too, that the Master permits a man previously convicted of ***** to serve as Executor, in this case perpetuating behaviour for which he was at first convicted.