Mancosa the place dreams go to die

Now I find out that fellow students in my class are having their scripts remarked at this hour and mine was just given the feedback I was missing that should've been there in the first place were it properly marked. The marking was done as if I was studying to be a Project manager instead of an ITM graduate. I'm not a professional at Project Management, yet you could swear its as if I marked at a Postgrad or even Masters level with what was required from the marker vs what was on the listed requirements of the rubric. I honestly feel like Mancosa just draws straws and deals with nothing properly. I wasn't told of the changes, I just saw the added feedback on my account while my peers get remarks done for the same issues and concerns I voiced to the institution. this is utterly unacceptable standards. The marking doesn't align to the rubric of the case study nor does the question specifically ask for what the marker is predetermining to be part of the answer. This is very unprofessional and incomprehensible for a marker to come in and just seemingly wing it based on how they feel and not using the appropriate marking criteria. funny enough I took a page out of Mancosa's playbook and used AI just like my Lecturer did, and asked it if the grade and the feedback were valid based on the work produced and submitted. and its disagreed. It showed how flawed the marking was and how the marker must be using different criteria or may have manipulated the rubric or scoring to something different than what was produced and sent to us students as the grade did not match what the marker was calling for in the feedback yet the work perfectly matched an achieved level of outcome for all areas and some even at the exemplary level based on the questions asked and the information given. I refuse to believe that i'm being treated fairly in this regard and I would love to take this further as I still feel I have not gotten meaningful feedback, due to the feedback being utter nonsense and doesn't relate to what was submitted which aligned with what was asked in the questions even though the question lacked crucial information which we as students needed to fabricate. Pathetic attempt as fixing your mistake Mancosa. Try harder