NPS Score
-100
Recommended: Unlikely
Feb '26 - Sep '26
Frequently Asked Questions About Lev-capita
How is Lev-capita rated on Hellopeter?
Hellopeter has tracked Lev-capita across 3 reviews. Lev-capita hasn't collected enough recent reviews — at least 10 in the last 12 months are needed — to calculate a TrustIndex score. Have you used Lev-capita? Write a review to help others decide.
Recent reviews (3)
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Used this business recently? Share your experience to help others decide.
Share Your Experience1 reviews | Active since Sept 2026
Expirience
I've had a positive experience so far. The support from the account managers has been excellent, and although withdrawals sometimes require additional checks, it's reassuring to know they follow strict procedures.
1 reviews | Active since Sept 2026
Expirience
I've had a positive experience so far. The support from the account managers has been excellent, and although withdrawals sometimes require additional checks, it's reassuring to know they follow strict procedures.
1 reviews | Active since Sept 2026
Thank you Namir
I would never normally write a review, but I have to say that I am extremely happy with the overall service I have received from Namir. My first experience with other brokers was honestly horrible, but Namir has completely changed my perspective and given me the confidence to move forward. The onboarding process was smooth, professional, and everything was explained thoroughly and clearly. I always felt that I understood what was happening and what to expect. I am very happy with the service I have received so far. Thank you, Namir, for the excellent experience!
1 reviews | Active since Sept 2026
Thank you Namir
I would never normally write a review, but I have to say that I am extremely happy with the overall service I have received from Namir. My first experience with other brokers was honestly horrible, but Namir has completely changed my perspective and given me the confidence to move forward. The onboarding process was smooth, professional, and everything was explained thoroughly and clearly. I always felt that I understood what was happening and what to expect. I am very happy with the service I have received so far. Thank you, Namir, for the excellent experience!
1 reviews | Active since Dec 2019
Lev Capita, Namir Trade, Swiffy Tech.
Press Kit: Broker Manipulation and Synthetic Collapse Client: Craig Anthony Ferreira Platform: MetaTrader 5Broker: [Name withheld for regulatory review]Date Range: 13–20 November 2025 Executive Summary Craig Ferreira experienced a fabricated trading loss of $156,351.88 due to a synthetic collapse in Netflix pricing on 18 November 2025. The broker injected trades, manipulated ledger entries, and app**** rollback logic without consent. Despite repeated requests, no forensic breakdown, audit trail, or incident report has been provided. Timeline of Events 14 Nov: Normal trading behavior, no Netflix exposure, stable platform 17 Nov: Manual balance entry of R37,334.34 injected at 17:04:02; "Negative bonus" app**** 18 Nov: Netflix buy trade injected at R1,162.85 → R381.09; fabricated loss of $156,351.88 18 Nov: Seven Netflix sell trades injected; fabricated profits of R114,198.17 18 Nov: Manual balance entry of $4,773.72 inserted and removed within 24 seconds 20 Nov: Trading continued until 21:46 despite claims of resolution on 17 Nov Key Contradictions Broker Claim Contradicted By Evidence Loss occurred on 17 Nov Collapse occurred on 18 Nov Cloudflare caused issue No outage confirmed Trades were restored No matching trades in MT5 logs Platform was stable Instability continued until 20 Nov Credit was corrective Inserted and removed in 24 seconds Supporting Evidence Timestamped MT5 trade logs Screenshots of Netflix collapse and ghost trade injection Ledger entries showing manual manipulation Absence of incident ID or forensic report Call to Action Craig Ferreira demands full restitution, regulatory investigation, and public accountability. This case sets a precedent for systemic reform in trading platform transparency and broker accountability.
1 reviews | Active since Dec 2019
Lev Capita, Namir Trade, Swiffy Tech.
Press Kit: Broker Manipulation and Synthetic Collapse Client: Craig Anthony Ferreira Platform: MetaTrader 5Broker: [Name withheld for regulatory review]Date Range: 13–20 November 2025 Executive Summary Craig Ferreira experienced a fabricated trading loss of $156,351.88 due to a synthetic collapse in Netflix pricing on 18 November 2025. The broker injected trades, manipulated ledger entries, and app**** rollback logic without consent. Despite repeated requests, no forensic breakdown, audit trail, or incident report has been provided. Timeline of Events 14 Nov: Normal trading behavior, no Netflix exposure, stable platform 17 Nov: Manual balance entry of R37,334.34 injected at 17:04:02; "Negative bonus" app**** 18 Nov: Netflix buy trade injected at R1,162.85 → R381.09; fabricated loss of $156,351.88 18 Nov: Seven Netflix sell trades injected; fabricated profits of R114,198.17 18 Nov: Manual balance entry of $4,773.72 inserted and removed within 24 seconds 20 Nov: Trading continued until 21:46 despite claims of resolution on 17 Nov Key Contradictions Broker Claim Contradicted By Evidence Loss occurred on 17 Nov Collapse occurred on 18 Nov Cloudflare caused issue No outage confirmed Trades were restored No matching trades in MT5 logs Platform was stable Instability continued until 20 Nov Credit was corrective Inserted and removed in 24 seconds Supporting Evidence Timestamped MT5 trade logs Screenshots of Netflix collapse and ghost trade injection Ledger entries showing manual manipulation Absence of incident ID or forensic report Call to Action Craig Ferreira demands full restitution, regulatory investigation, and public accountability. This case sets a precedent for systemic reform in trading platform transparency and broker accountability.