NC
Nick C

1 reviews | Active since Nov 2012

11 Sept 2017, 17:09

Arrogant, unhelpful, and ignore standard accepted business practice

When I signed up I specifically amended the signed contract to the effect that I would pay levy "3 months prior to occupation". Tha amendment is contained in writing. In any normal business agreement, that means "90 days prior to occupation". Since my occupation date is 27 December, that means that I have agreed to pay the levy by 37 September. But LPA have already added a 'collection fee' to my account as since end -August. According to them, if my occupation date is ANY TIME DURING DECEMBER, then '3 months prior' means BY THE END OF AUGUST. That contradicts any accepted business practice, since it effectively (in my case) makes the levy due almost 120 days in advance of occupation instead of the agreed 90 days. When I queried this, their response was to send me multiple copies of the statement reflecting the disputed collection fee. I eventually managed to get hold of one of their call centre agents who promised to investigate and let me know the outcome, within half an hour. That was 3 hours ago.

0
Replies (3)
Leisure Portfolio Association
Leisure Portfolio Association's reply12 Sept 2017, 10:13
Official

Good day Mr Corbin,

We confirm receipt of your complaint, the contents of which have been noted.

Please be advised that we are currently investigating your complaint and will revert back to you soonest.

Kind Regards,
The LPA team

Leisure Portfolio Association
Leisure Portfolio Association's reply14 Sept 2017, 15:09
Official

Good day Mr Corbin,

We confirm that a LPA consultant has been in contact with you and that your query has been successfully resolved.

Please feel free to close this query .

The LPA team

NC
Nick C's update14 Sept 2017, 17:45
Reviewer Update
Took a week, and far too much stress, but this complaint was eventually resolved to my satisfaction.