Bad Service received from IWYZE

STILL NO FEEDBACK FROM IWYZE IWYZE rejection letter was unfairly upheld

How is my claim rejected by IWYZE if at the time of the accident which the other party caused was repaired without any issues. At that same time was IWYZE not supposed to have investigated the cause of the accident, who was at fault and to have contacted the other party after having received the accident report? It seems this has not been done. Take Note that when IWYZE repaired my car at the time, I was not informed about being blacklisted. My car was repaired without any hassles. IWYZE, should be held accountable for not resolving this problem at the beginning of the claim but as a loyal client of IWYZE I am very disappointed. WHY WAS MY CAR REPAIRED IF I WAS BLACKLISTED ALREADY FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, WAS MY CLAIM NOT SUPPOSED TO BE REJECTED AS WELL FOR MY CAR. It is important to note the other party who caused the accident after a few years send a summonds to my house, the Sheriff with the red ants and blacklisted me. At the time I was separated from my husband and had moved out. Someone else signed for the summons but I eventually responded to the other party to resend me the summons which they did. I responded and told them that I did not cause the accident and I requested that they pull a tracker report to see how fast their driver was driving on a 40km/h street but they told me to get my lawyer to respond because my responds is not acceptable. I has to acquire a private lawyer to stop the Sheriff from taking my stuff and the lawyer still needs to be paid. My question is why is the rejection being made by IWYZE on the basis of events that happened a long time after my car was repaired, was everything not supposed to have been resolved with the other party by IWYZE at that same time when my claim was approved. The rejection leaves room for the other party to once more send the Sheriff and the red ants to return and attach my stuff for an accident I did not cause.

Sent from my Galaxy

-------- Original message --------

From: Ombudsman for Short-term Insurance <***>

Date: 2024/02/16 14:06 (GMT+02:00)

To: ***, ***

Subject: CLC B572/23 - Bailey, Pertunia - Old Mutual Insure Ltd OSTICRM:***

Good day,

Please see the attached correspondence, which is also saved here for your records.

When corresponding with us, please reply to the last email sent to you by us without changing the subject line of the email.

Regards, Ombudsman for Short-Term Insurance

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be ********.

This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast, a leader in email security and cyber resilience. Mimecast integrates email defenses with brand protection, security awareness training, web security, compliance and other essential capabilities. Mimecast helps protect large and small organizations from malicious activity, human error and technology failure; and to lead the movement toward building a more resilient world. To find out more, visit our website.

No member of the Western Cape Police Ombudsman is responsible for lost, delayed, misdirected, internet or computer malfunctions, errors in transmission or any condition beyond the control of this office, which may cause correspondence to be disrupted or *******ed.

"All views or opinions expressed in this electronic message and its attachments are the view of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Western Cape Government (the WCG). No employee of the WCG is entitled to conclude a binding contract on behalf of the WCG unless he/she is an accounting officer of the WCG, or his or her authorised representative. The information contained in this message and its attachments may be confidential or privileged and is for the use of the named recipient only, except where the sender specifically states otherwise. If you are not the intended recipient you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone."