HM
Honour M
1 reviews | Active since Feb 2024
26 Feb 2024, 18:49
******ion at Immigration Migration
<div>I paid R75k for a program to migrate to New Zealand last year in May, the process has stagnated to a point I app**** for a refund. IM responded that they don’t refund fees as they consider them earned. They are not worried that my process failed at the first stage of their inability to find me employment which they promised to. Their contract is clear on one clause that if they are unable to find me employment I can claim a refund. I am now busy engaging them to claim my money which they consider to have earned</div>
Helpful (0)
Replies (8)0
Replies (8)HM
Honour M's updateReviewer Update
28 Feb 2024, 14:52Immigration migration have decided that they refund me a paltry R7 500 out of the R75k I paid. I need legal advice to pursue this case:
1. I want to understand if I am protected by law in my case, where I paid for a service I did not receive. Immigration Migration failed to produce a comprehensive assessment report that enabled me to qualify to get employment in New Zealand as per their assessment. I am convinced that their report was only tailor made for me to pay. The flawed assessment report insinuated that I qualified for a program I struggled to get employment with.
1. I want to understand if I am protected by law in my case, where I paid for a service I did not receive. Immigration Migration failed to produce a comprehensive assessment report that enabled me to qualify to get employment in New Zealand as per their assessment. I am convinced that their report was only tailor made for me to pay. The flawed assessment report insinuated that I qualified for a program I struggled to get employment with.
2. Immigration Migration is not specific on which terms of guarantee I failed to comply with. I have clauses in the agreement that support my claim but IM is not considering them.
3. Immigration Migration say it doesn’t involve itself in securing employment, but has clauses in the agreement that they will assist in employment matters, I want assistance to understand if there any limitations in the employment matters they are obligated to assist and those they can’t and how do I, as a client know. We can not talk of employment matters without employment.
4. I also want to understand if IM rates of charges for work done are fair or if there are any governing regulations on these rates.
5. Can IM considers their earnings legitimate while I as the client am not happy with their service?
Immigration migration is abusing clients someone needs to to stop them.
5. Can IM considers their earnings legitimate while I as the client am not happy with their service?
Immigration migration is abusing clients someone needs to to stop them.
HM
Honour M's update28 Feb 2024, 14:52
Reviewer Update
Immigration migration have decided that they refund me a paltry R7 500 out of the R75k I paid. I need legal advice to pursue this case:
1. I want to understand if I am protected by law in my case, where I paid for a service I did not receive. Immigration Migration failed to produce a comprehensive assessment report that enabled me to qualify to get employment in New Zealand as per their assessment. I am convinced that their report was only tailor made for me to pay. The flawed assessment report insinuated that I qualified for a program I struggled to get employment with.
1. I want to understand if I am protected by law in my case, where I paid for a service I did not receive. Immigration Migration failed to produce a comprehensive assessment report that enabled me to qualify to get employment in New Zealand as per their assessment. I am convinced that their report was only tailor made for me to pay. The flawed assessment report insinuated that I qualified for a program I struggled to get employment with.
2. Immigration Migration is not specific on which terms of guarantee I failed to comply with. I have clauses in the agreement that support my claim but IM is not considering them.
3. Immigration Migration say it doesn’t involve itself in securing employment, but has clauses in the agreement that they will assist in employment matters, I want assistance to understand if there any limitations in the employment matters they are obligated to assist and those they can’t and how do I, as a client know. We can not talk of employment matters without employment.
4. I also want to understand if IM rates of charges for work done are fair or if there are any governing regulations on these rates.
5. Can IM considers their earnings legitimate while I as the client am not happy with their service?
Immigration migration is abusing clients someone needs to to stop them.
5. Can IM considers their earnings legitimate while I as the client am not happy with their service?
Immigration migration is abusing clients someone needs to to stop them.
Immigration Migration limited - Gauteng South Africa's replyOfficial
01 Mar 2024, 09:37Hi Honoured,
In response to your claims:
1. I want to understand if I am protected by law in my case, where I paid for a service I did not receive. Immigration Migration failed to produce a comprehensive assessment report that enabled me to qualify to get employment in New Zealand as per their assessment. I am convinced that their report was only tailor-made for me to pay. The flawed assessment report insinuated that I qualified for a program I struggled to get employment with.
Our responses:
- You claimed we did not produce an assessment report, in fact, we did and shared it with you
- Nowhere in the contract did we state that we would secure a job offer on your behalf. Our role was to assist you in reviewing and guiding the creation of your CV, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile. Additionally, we provided job ads and job specifications to you and advised you on how to apply. We also offered coaching and assistance through several meetings. Overall, we have logged about 44 hours of work, as documented in our workdone report.
- We have fulfilled our obligations as outlined in the agreement. We have not failed to perform any tasks, but if you think we are, please do let us know, by referring to the bullet points from the contract.
2. Immigration Migration is not specific on which terms of guarantee I failed to comply with. I have clauses in the agreement that support my claim but IM is not considering them.
Our responses:
- The term you failed to comply with is "The Company guarantees that should The Client follow all guidance on finding work, including attending interviews in NZ for not less than 3 weeks, and fail to secure an offer of employment we will continue working with The Client until they are successful or refund our fee to them". This term is clearly stated in the contract that you signed. You did not go to NZ, you did not follow the terms of the agreement, therefore you are not entitled to a refund.
3. Immigration Migration say it doesn’t involve itself in securing employment, but has clauses in the agreement that they will assist in employment matters, I want assistance to understand if there any limitations in the employment matters they are obligated to assist and those they can’t and how do I, as a client know. We cannot talk of employment matters without employment.
Our responses:
Our responses:
- The term you failed to comply with is "The Company guarantees that should The Client follow all guidance on finding work, including attending interviews in NZ for not less than 3 weeks, and fail to secure an offer of employment we will continue working with The Client until they are successful or refund our fee to them". This term is clearly stated in the contract that you signed. You did not go to NZ, you did not follow the terms of the agreement, therefore you are not entitled to a refund.
3. Immigration Migration say it doesn’t involve itself in securing employment, but has clauses in the agreement that they will assist in employment matters, I want assistance to understand if there any limitations in the employment matters they are obligated to assist and those they can’t and how do I, as a client know. We cannot talk of employment matters without employment.
Our responses:
-Nowhere in the contract did we state that we would secure a job offer on your behalf. Our role was to assist you in reviewing and guiding the creation of your CV, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile. Additionally, we provided job ads and job specifications to you and advised you on how to apply. We also offered coaching and assistance through several meetings, as documented in our workdone report.
-The services that we provide are listed in the contract, as follows:
§ Comprehensive assessment of the client's situation
-The services that we provide are listed in the contract, as follows:
§ Comprehensive assessment of the client's situation
§ Produce a specific immigration Assessment Report
§ Provide a statement detailing timing and costs
§ Provide a list of documents and support information to be collated by the client
§ Review client’s documentation and support information
§ Preparation of visa applications
§ Submission of visa applications
§ Liaising with INZ
§ Tailor made CV, cover letter, and job profiles
§ Mock interviews
§ Webinars on finding work and settling in NZ
§ Access to IML Learning Center
§ A list of employers to focus on
§ Additional services such as field-specific job searches
§ Support and guidance on how to contact NZ employers, conduct trip to NZ
§ Settlement support provided upon request
4. I also want to understand if IM rates of charges for work done are fair or if there are any governing regulations on these rates.
Our responses:
- Regarding the staff rate for IML, we charge according to the industry standard. As a New Zealand company, we charge prices that are in line with the local market. If you disagree with our pricing, you were under no obligation to sign with us initially.
5. Can IM considers their earnings legitimate while I as the client am not happy with their service?
Our responses:
Our responses:
In summary, you did not follow our instructions as stated in the agreement, which includes visiting New Zealand and attending interviews for a minimum of three weeks. As a result, you have been unable to secure a job. You then accused our business as illegitimate.
The agreement clearly states that if you follow our instructions and still fail to find employment, we will refund our fees to you. Since this is not the case, no refund will be issued. However, we are open to negotiation to solve this matter amicably and promptly. You may reach out to us to discuss further via email.
Note to HelloPeter: We value our clients' feedback as long as it is honest and transparent. It is crucial for clients to provide genuine and impartial feedback rather than resorting to using social media as a tool for manipulation/negotiation. Transparency is key, and readers should have access to all pertinent information, which in this case, is not publicly available (due to the nature of business). I respectfully urge HelloPeter to consider this before endorsing/approving any negative reviews.
Immigration Migration limited - Gauteng South Africa's reply01 Mar 2024, 09:37
Official
Hi Honoured,
In response to your claims:
1. I want to understand if I am protected by law in my case, where I paid for a service I did not receive. Immigration Migration failed to produce a comprehensive assessment report that enabled me to qualify to get employment in New Zealand as per their assessment. I am convinced that their report was only tailor-made for me to pay. The flawed assessment report insinuated that I qualified for a program I struggled to get employment with.
Our responses:
- You claimed we did not produce an assessment report, in fact, we did and shared it with you
- Nowhere in the contract did we state that we would secure a job offer on your behalf. Our role was to assist you in reviewing and guiding the creation of your CV, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile. Additionally, we provided job ads and job specifications to you and advised you on how to apply. We also offered coaching and assistance through several meetings. Overall, we have logged about 44 hours of work, as documented in our workdone report.
- We have fulfilled our obligations as outlined in the agreement. We have not failed to perform any tasks, but if you think we are, please do let us know, by referring to the bullet points from the contract.
2. Immigration Migration is not specific on which terms of guarantee I failed to comply with. I have clauses in the agreement that support my claim but IM is not considering them.
Our responses:
- The term you failed to comply with is "The Company guarantees that should The Client follow all guidance on finding work, including attending interviews in NZ for not less than 3 weeks, and fail to secure an offer of employment we will continue working with The Client until they are successful or refund our fee to them". This term is clearly stated in the contract that you signed. You did not go to NZ, you did not follow the terms of the agreement, therefore you are not entitled to a refund.
3. Immigration Migration say it doesn’t involve itself in securing employment, but has clauses in the agreement that they will assist in employment matters, I want assistance to understand if there any limitations in the employment matters they are obligated to assist and those they can’t and how do I, as a client know. We cannot talk of employment matters without employment.
Our responses:
Our responses:
- The term you failed to comply with is "The Company guarantees that should The Client follow all guidance on finding work, including attending interviews in NZ for not less than 3 weeks, and fail to secure an offer of employment we will continue working with The Client until they are successful or refund our fee to them". This term is clearly stated in the contract that you signed. You did not go to NZ, you did not follow the terms of the agreement, therefore you are not entitled to a refund.
3. Immigration Migration say it doesn’t involve itself in securing employment, but has clauses in the agreement that they will assist in employment matters, I want assistance to understand if there any limitations in the employment matters they are obligated to assist and those they can’t and how do I, as a client know. We cannot talk of employment matters without employment.
Our responses:
-Nowhere in the contract did we state that we would secure a job offer on your behalf. Our role was to assist you in reviewing and guiding the creation of your CV, cover letter, and LinkedIn profile. Additionally, we provided job ads and job specifications to you and advised you on how to apply. We also offered coaching and assistance through several meetings, as documented in our workdone report.
-The services that we provide are listed in the contract, as follows:
§ Comprehensive assessment of the client's situation
-The services that we provide are listed in the contract, as follows:
§ Comprehensive assessment of the client's situation
§ Produce a specific immigration Assessment Report
§ Provide a statement detailing timing and costs
§ Provide a list of documents and support information to be collated by the client
§ Review client’s documentation and support information
§ Preparation of visa applications
§ Submission of visa applications
§ Liaising with INZ
§ Tailor made CV, cover letter, and job profiles
§ Mock interviews
§ Webinars on finding work and settling in NZ
§ Access to IML Learning Center
§ A list of employers to focus on
§ Additional services such as field-specific job searches
§ Support and guidance on how to contact NZ employers, conduct trip to NZ
§ Settlement support provided upon request
4. I also want to understand if IM rates of charges for work done are fair or if there are any governing regulations on these rates.
Our responses:
- Regarding the staff rate for IML, we charge according to the industry standard. As a New Zealand company, we charge prices that are in line with the local market. If you disagree with our pricing, you were under no obligation to sign with us initially.
5. Can IM considers their earnings legitimate while I as the client am not happy with their service?
Our responses:
Our responses:
In summary, you did not follow our instructions as stated in the agreement, which includes visiting New Zealand and attending interviews for a minimum of three weeks. As a result, you have been unable to secure a job. You then accused our business as illegitimate.
The agreement clearly states that if you follow our instructions and still fail to find employment, we will refund our fees to you. Since this is not the case, no refund will be issued. However, we are open to negotiation to solve this matter amicably and promptly. You may reach out to us to discuss further via email.
Note to HelloPeter: We value our clients' feedback as long as it is honest and transparent. It is crucial for clients to provide genuine and impartial feedback rather than resorting to using social media as a tool for manipulation/negotiation. Transparency is key, and readers should have access to all pertinent information, which in this case, is not publicly available (due to the nature of business). I respectfully urge HelloPeter to consider this before endorsing/approving any negative reviews.
HM
Honour M's updateReviewer Update
04 Mar 2024, 07:21Immigration migration must cease and desist from being *********. They conveniently avoided mentioning their scope of responsibilities on employment matters in their reply. IM is evasive on employment matters.
I will quote verbatim bullet points in the contract that are the basis of my arguments, highlighting services provided by IM:
Bullet point 1: IM services include:
Assessment of the Client’s situation:
IM has the responsibility to assess clients’ situations with integrity and offer professional services according to their circumstances. My assessment was not comprehensively dealt to ensure I progress beyond the first huddle for 8 months. I am convinced this flawed assessment report was only adopted for financial reasons.
Bullet point 4: IM services include:
Webinar’s on finding work and setting up in New Zealand
This point obligates IM to find work for me through webinars or maybe any other way. Finding work is an integral part of the process of getting a work visa. Naturally, for work visa applications, IM knows that if there is no job offer letter there is no migration program to talk about.
Bullet point 6: IM services include:
A list of employers the client should focus on according to their occupation and experience
The provision, to me after payment, of the list of various New Zealand employers by IM only confirms monetary motives behind every move they make. Employment agents and Labour brokers also provide such a service but they only receive payment upon successful completion of the task from employers. The hours spent by IM on trying to guide me through their employment seeking techniques proved futile and IM does not deserve any payment for trying.
Bullet point 13: IM services include:
The Company guarantees that should The Client follow all guidelines on finding work, including attending interviews in NZ for not less than 3 weeks, and fail to secure an offer of employment we will continue working with The Client until they are successful or refund our fees to them
This bullet point is explicit that IM will continue working with the client until they are successful or a refund fees. Success is finding employment leading to migration. Unfortunately the later cannot be achieved without the former. IM has failed to guide me to find employment in 8 months. (Ref to attachment below) IM guidance failed to yield any results, they cannot expect a payment for failing. IM did not expect me to travel to New Zealand and walk from one company to another seeking an interview. I paid R75k for guidance to a seamless migration process. To IM it’s business as usual since they have already pocketed their “considered earnings” and are not worried about any failure of the application.
Clause 2 Agreement
The Clients authorities the Company and its agents to present and act on their behalf on all matters relating to their immigration process, including employment and immigration applications
This clause very clear that IM should act on behalf of the their clients on immigration and employment applications. (refer to an email extract below from IM)
It is also worth noting that for all the man hours IM purport to have spent working on my application, almost all the hours were spent on job hunting, employment related issues. Why then should they spend so much time on matters they are not responsible for?
Furthermore, it does not make sense, for a company that says it does not assist to find a job, that after an assessment, a person seeking employment opportunities in New Zealand is deemed to have qualified for an migration program, even without a job offer letter. Accordingly IM should simply disqualify that person since it does not assist on employment matter. Instead IM receives a payment and embarks on a pretentious job hunting crusade that may or may not succeed. If it succeeds, all accolades to IM but if it fails, IM accepts no responsibility but brings out clauses to blame the client for not understanding their limitations on the scope of employment matters.
I want South Africans to understand the creature IM is so they do not fall in the same trap as myself.
HM
Honour M's update04 Mar 2024, 07:21
Reviewer Update
Immigration migration must cease and desist from being *********. They conveniently avoided mentioning their scope of responsibilities on employment matters in their reply. IM is evasive on employment matters.
I will quote verbatim bullet points in the contract that are the basis of my arguments, highlighting services provided by IM:
Bullet point 1: IM services include:
Assessment of the Client’s situation:
IM has the responsibility to assess clients’ situations with integrity and offer professional services according to their circumstances. My assessment was not comprehensively dealt to ensure I progress beyond the first huddle for 8 months. I am convinced this flawed assessment report was only adopted for financial reasons.
Bullet point 4: IM services include:
Webinar’s on finding work and setting up in New Zealand
This point obligates IM to find work for me through webinars or maybe any other way. Finding work is an integral part of the process of getting a work visa. Naturally, for work visa applications, IM knows that if there is no job offer letter there is no migration program to talk about.
Bullet point 6: IM services include:
A list of employers the client should focus on according to their occupation and experience
The provision, to me after payment, of the list of various New Zealand employers by IM only confirms monetary motives behind every move they make. Employment agents and Labour brokers also provide such a service but they only receive payment upon successful completion of the task from employers. The hours spent by IM on trying to guide me through their employment seeking techniques proved futile and IM does not deserve any payment for trying.
Bullet point 13: IM services include:
The Company guarantees that should The Client follow all guidelines on finding work, including attending interviews in NZ for not less than 3 weeks, and fail to secure an offer of employment we will continue working with The Client until they are successful or refund our fees to them
This bullet point is explicit that IM will continue working with the client until they are successful or a refund fees. Success is finding employment leading to migration. Unfortunately the later cannot be achieved without the former. IM has failed to guide me to find employment in 8 months. (Ref to attachment below) IM guidance failed to yield any results, they cannot expect a payment for failing. IM did not expect me to travel to New Zealand and walk from one company to another seeking an interview. I paid R75k for guidance to a seamless migration process. To IM it’s business as usual since they have already pocketed their “considered earnings” and are not worried about any failure of the application.
Clause 2 Agreement
The Clients authorities the Company and its agents to present and act on their behalf on all matters relating to their immigration process, including employment and immigration applications
This clause very clear that IM should act on behalf of the their clients on immigration and employment applications. (refer to an email extract below from IM)
It is also worth noting that for all the man hours IM purport to have spent working on my application, almost all the hours were spent on job hunting, employment related issues. Why then should they spend so much time on matters they are not responsible for?
Furthermore, it does not make sense, for a company that says it does not assist to find a job, that after an assessment, a person seeking employment opportunities in New Zealand is deemed to have qualified for an migration program, even without a job offer letter. Accordingly IM should simply disqualify that person since it does not assist on employment matter. Instead IM receives a payment and embarks on a pretentious job hunting crusade that may or may not succeed. If it succeeds, all accolades to IM but if it fails, IM accepts no responsibility but brings out clauses to blame the client for not understanding their limitations on the scope of employment matters.
I want South Africans to understand the creature IM is so they do not fall in the same trap as myself.
HM
Honour M's updateReviewer Update
12 Mar 2024, 15:18Muzanzi should be aware of the requirements of the visa program they are applying for and not to rely on evaluation by the socalled migration experts.
Immigration migration is obligated by a clause in their contract: To assess a client situation
Before taking their money, IM has the responsibility to assess their clients’ situations with integrity and offer professional migration advice according to their clients’ divergent circumstances. In my situation, I intended to settle in New Zealand on a work visa permit. With now IM claiming that they do not to assist their clients to find employment, but only assist on other unspecified employment matters, IM should have immediately disqualified me on the basis that I did not possess the necessary employment documents for the visa I intended to apply for, and that their policy does not allow them to assist me to look for work to get those documents. Instead for monetary reasons, IM adjudged that I qualified and therefore I paid R75k for the process to commence. And the process stalled for 8 months. A comprehensively done assessment can just not stall at the first huddle without a plausible explanation, unless of course if the process is a consequences of a flawed assessment report. The adage garbage in garbage out aptly applies.
Beware and be alert
Immigration migration is obligated by a clause in their contract: To assess a client situation
Before taking their money, IM has the responsibility to assess their clients’ situations with integrity and offer professional migration advice according to their clients’ divergent circumstances. In my situation, I intended to settle in New Zealand on a work visa permit. With now IM claiming that they do not to assist their clients to find employment, but only assist on other unspecified employment matters, IM should have immediately disqualified me on the basis that I did not possess the necessary employment documents for the visa I intended to apply for, and that their policy does not allow them to assist me to look for work to get those documents. Instead for monetary reasons, IM adjudged that I qualified and therefore I paid R75k for the process to commence. And the process stalled for 8 months. A comprehensively done assessment can just not stall at the first huddle without a plausible explanation, unless of course if the process is a consequences of a flawed assessment report. The adage garbage in garbage out aptly applies.
Beware and be alert
HM
Honour M's update12 Mar 2024, 15:18
Reviewer Update
Muzanzi should be aware of the requirements of the visa program they are applying for and not to rely on evaluation by the socalled migration experts.
Immigration migration is obligated by a clause in their contract: To assess a client situation
Before taking their money, IM has the responsibility to assess their clients’ situations with integrity and offer professional migration advice according to their clients’ divergent circumstances. In my situation, I intended to settle in New Zealand on a work visa permit. With now IM claiming that they do not to assist their clients to find employment, but only assist on other unspecified employment matters, IM should have immediately disqualified me on the basis that I did not possess the necessary employment documents for the visa I intended to apply for, and that their policy does not allow them to assist me to look for work to get those documents. Instead for monetary reasons, IM adjudged that I qualified and therefore I paid R75k for the process to commence. And the process stalled for 8 months. A comprehensively done assessment can just not stall at the first huddle without a plausible explanation, unless of course if the process is a consequences of a flawed assessment report. The adage garbage in garbage out aptly applies.
Beware and be alert
Immigration migration is obligated by a clause in their contract: To assess a client situation
Before taking their money, IM has the responsibility to assess their clients’ situations with integrity and offer professional migration advice according to their clients’ divergent circumstances. In my situation, I intended to settle in New Zealand on a work visa permit. With now IM claiming that they do not to assist their clients to find employment, but only assist on other unspecified employment matters, IM should have immediately disqualified me on the basis that I did not possess the necessary employment documents for the visa I intended to apply for, and that their policy does not allow them to assist me to look for work to get those documents. Instead for monetary reasons, IM adjudged that I qualified and therefore I paid R75k for the process to commence. And the process stalled for 8 months. A comprehensively done assessment can just not stall at the first huddle without a plausible explanation, unless of course if the process is a consequences of a flawed assessment report. The adage garbage in garbage out aptly applies.
Beware and be alert
HM
Honour M's updateReviewer Update
19 Mar 2024, 07:32Update on my Immigration Migration review
Mzanzi, numbers don’t lie.
The Immigration Migration contract that I signed contains 2 stages of processes to complete the Work Visa migration program.
Stage 1 charges are reflected in the agreement as NZ$ $6000, equivalent to R75k at the time I paid. This stage requires that IM assists me, through coordination of their complex web of processes, which build up, to secure News Zealand Work Visa requirements for me to proceed to Stage 2, for the migration application process to commence. Successful completion of this stage is reflected in progression to Stage 2.
Stage 2 charges are quoted at NZ$3000, payable after the work visa migration process is successfully completed. This stage depends solely on successful completion of Stage 1. No job, no work visa application and therefore, no Stage 2.
At the date of my cancellation, the process had stagnated on Stage 1 for more than 8 months with no prospects of success. After cancellation, IM claimed that the cost of the work they performed amounted to NZ$10 550. Surprisingly a statement of “work performed” attached on the same submissions had a totalised bill of NZ$12 625, creating serious suspicions that the numbers are doctored to deceive. Both amounts are inflated. Projected costs for a completed Stage 1 is NZ$6000. If an incomplete process can almost double the initial projected amount, I shudder to think how much a final successful Stage 1 process eventually cost, NZ$20k?? Or maybe IM inflates invoices as a form of punishment for cancellation.
Lastly, IM proposes that I renounce my Hello Peter reviews so that they can reward me with a donation of NZ$1000 as a sign of a good gesture. Even that amount does not correlate with the work they put into the uncompleted Stage 1.
HM
Honour M's update19 Mar 2024, 07:32
Reviewer Update
Update on my Immigration Migration review
Mzanzi, numbers don’t lie.
The Immigration Migration contract that I signed contains 2 stages of processes to complete the Work Visa migration program.
Stage 1 charges are reflected in the agreement as NZ$ $6000, equivalent to R75k at the time I paid. This stage requires that IM assists me, through coordination of their complex web of processes, which build up, to secure News Zealand Work Visa requirements for me to proceed to Stage 2, for the migration application process to commence. Successful completion of this stage is reflected in progression to Stage 2.
Stage 2 charges are quoted at NZ$3000, payable after the work visa migration process is successfully completed. This stage depends solely on successful completion of Stage 1. No job, no work visa application and therefore, no Stage 2.
At the date of my cancellation, the process had stagnated on Stage 1 for more than 8 months with no prospects of success. After cancellation, IM claimed that the cost of the work they performed amounted to NZ$10 550. Surprisingly a statement of “work performed” attached on the same submissions had a totalised bill of NZ$12 625, creating serious suspicions that the numbers are doctored to deceive. Both amounts are inflated. Projected costs for a completed Stage 1 is NZ$6000. If an incomplete process can almost double the initial projected amount, I shudder to think how much a final successful Stage 1 process eventually cost, NZ$20k?? Or maybe IM inflates invoices as a form of punishment for cancellation.
Lastly, IM proposes that I renounce my Hello Peter reviews so that they can reward me with a donation of NZ$1000 as a sign of a good gesture. Even that amount does not correlate with the work they put into the uncompleted Stage 1.
HM
Honour M's updateReviewer Update
06 Mar 2025, 13:59Update on my case, I am now in possession of a default judgment against Immigration Migration and the sheriff has a warrant to attach property but Immigration migration seems to have deleted their last known SA address….. The sheriff need to locate their address if someone could assist
HM
Honour M's update06 Mar 2025, 13:59
Reviewer Update
Update on my case, I am now in possession of a default judgment against Immigration Migration and the sheriff has a warrant to attach property but Immigration migration seems to have deleted their last known SA address….. The sheriff need to locate their address if someone could assist
HM
Honour M's updateReviewer Update
09 Apr 2025, 11:20Update on my caseUpdate on my case
After receiving information on the current address Immigration Migration operates from, the sheriff proceeded to that address only to find the company operating in a “crucible” not even having assets to the value of the money they owe me. They are allegedly operating more like con artists without a permanent place.
A Mr Sean Collins, ostensibly from Immigration Migration, sent me an email after my last hello Peter post incoherently implying that Immigration Migration was unaware of the court case but now that he was aware he intended to resolve the issue asap, but up to now he has not contacted me as per his promise.
Let it be known to their New Zealand handlers, whose bank account I deposited my money into, that there is a subsisting court judgment against Immigration Migration here in South Africa for my refund.
HM
Honour M's update09 Apr 2025, 11:20
Reviewer Update
Update on my caseUpdate on my case
After receiving information on the current address Immigration Migration operates from, the sheriff proceeded to that address only to find the company operating in a “crucible” not even having assets to the value of the money they owe me. They are allegedly operating more like con artists without a permanent place.
A Mr Sean Collins, ostensibly from Immigration Migration, sent me an email after my last hello Peter post incoherently implying that Immigration Migration was unaware of the court case but now that he was aware he intended to resolve the issue asap, but up to now he has not contacted me as per his promise.
Let it be known to their New Zealand handlers, whose bank account I deposited my money into, that there is a subsisting court judgment against Immigration Migration here in South Africa for my refund.
HM
Honour M's updateReviewer Update
09 Apr 2025, 11:28Update on my case
After receiving information on the current address Immigration Migration operates from, the sheriff proceeded to that address on 31 March 2025 only to find that the company operating in a “crucible” and has no assets to the value of the money they owe me. The Sheriff’s assessment suggests that they operating more like con artists than a reputable international company.
A Mr Sean Collins, ostensibly from Immigration Migration, sent me an email after my last hello Peter post incoherently implying that Immigration Migration was unaware of the court case and now that he was aware he intended to resolve the issue asap, but up to now he has not contacted me as per his promise.
Let it be known to their New Zealand handlers, whose bank account I deposited my money into, that there is a subsisting court judgment against Immigration Migration here in South Africa for a refund.
HM
Honour M's update09 Apr 2025, 11:28
Reviewer Update
Update on my case
After receiving information on the current address Immigration Migration operates from, the sheriff proceeded to that address on 31 March 2025 only to find that the company operating in a “crucible” and has no assets to the value of the money they owe me. The Sheriff’s assessment suggests that they operating more like con artists than a reputable international company.
A Mr Sean Collins, ostensibly from Immigration Migration, sent me an email after my last hello Peter post incoherently implying that Immigration Migration was unaware of the court case and now that he was aware he intended to resolve the issue asap, but up to now he has not contacted me as per his promise.
Let it be known to their New Zealand handlers, whose bank account I deposited my money into, that there is a subsisting court judgment against Immigration Migration here in South Africa for a refund.
