BvdM
Bennie van der Merwe

1 reviews | Active since Mar 2015

22 Aug 2025, 08:50

FirstShop refused a reasonable swap request after inconsistent communication and ignoring their own returns policy.

FirstShop Refused a Reasonable Swap Request After Inconsistent Communication and Ignoring Their Own Returns Policy.

I purchased a monitor and graphics card from FirstShop to upgrade my 7-year-old work setup. I quickly found that the new monitor's visual quality was worse than my old one, despite being newer technology and having a higher refresh rate, making it unsuitable for my professional development work.

I immediately reached out to FirstShop with a reasonable solution: I asked to swap both items for a single, better-specced monitor. My company was willing to pay the R150 price difference and cover the shipping costs for the exchange.

Their initial response was to ask for photos of the products in their original packaging, which gave me the impression they were open to a return. However, after I provided the photos, they abruptly changed their minds. They refused the return, claiming they "do not facilitate sales on a trial basis" and that the items couldn't be returned once unboxed and used.

FirstShop is basing its refusal on a very narrow interpretation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), arguing the items are not technically "defective." They are ignoring a key part of the law, which states that products must be "of good quality" and "fit for the purpose" for which they are intended. A new, higher-spec monitor failing to provide a better viewing experience than a 7-year-old model (not used for gaming) clearly violates these principles.

This entire process has been deeply disappointing. FirstShop's actions contradict their own "Easy Returns" policy and their initial willingness to help. I am now lodging a formal complaint with the National Consumer Commission (NCC) to have this matter resolved.

0
Replies (9)
FirstShop
FirstShop's reply22 Aug 2025, 09:07
Official
Hello Bennie, Thank you for sharing your experience. For clarity, we’d like to explain why your request could not be approved. The Dell S2725H monitor you purchased functions fully within its published specifications: a 27-inch Full HD IPS display at 100Hz. As noted in the specifications available before purchase, a larger 27-inch Full HD screen will always have a lower pixel density than a smaller 24-inch Full HD screen. This is not a defect, but a normal outcome of screen size versus resolution. The ASUS GT730 graphics card you purchased also functions as advertised and does not affect pixel density. Our Terms of Service which are available and accepted during checkout, state clearly: We do not sell products on a trial basis (Clause 4.6). Returns of unwanted products must be unopened and agreed to in writing within 7 days (Clause 4.7). Goods must be checked for suitability before ordering, unless confirmed with us in writing beforehand (Clause 13.4). Because the monitor and graphics card were opened, used, and are not defective, they do not qualify for return under our returns policy or the Consumer Protection Act. We always strive to assist customers with genuine product issues, and our team is available to advise on suitable options prior to purchase. Unfortunately, in this case the products met their advertised specifications and were not defective, which is why a return could not be authorised.
BvdM
Bennie van der Merwe's update22 Aug 2025, 09:45
Reviewer Update
The pixel density is not the issue. The issue is the display quality/clarity iwhich is far worse than a 7 year old similar make monitor.at 60Hz refresh rate (Vs the new one at 100Hz). Clear and simple - this is a quality issue and I am not satisfied!

You said sure "we will do a return", just send us a few images. Once you saw the images you turned around and said no, you installed the graphics card in your PC and you powered the monitor up. Now it is used.

How else would I be able to see the display quality/clarity?
FirstShop
FirstShop's reply22 Aug 2025, 10:40
Official
Hi Bennie, We understand your concern, but we’d like to clarify the technical side so there is no misunderstanding. When two monitors have the same resolution 1080p but different sizes, the total number of pixels is identical, just over 2 million pixels in both cases. What changes is how tightly those pixels are packed together.
On a 24 inch monitor, those 2 million pixels are fitted into a smaller space, meaning each pixel is physically smaller and sits closer to the next. This creates a higher pixel density around 93 pixels per inch, which your eyes interpret as a sharper, more detailed image.
On a 27 inch monitor, those same 2 million pixels are spread across a larger surface. Each pixel is slightly bigger, the gaps between them are wider, and the pixel density drops  to about 82 pixels per inch. To the eye, fine details like text and thin lines will not look as crisp compared to the smaller screen, even though the resolution number 1080p has not changed.
This is the difference you are experiencing when you say the clarity is worse. It is not a defect with the Dell S2725H, but the normal outcome of screen size compared to resolution. The monitor is producing the exact picture it is designed to, Full HD at 100Hz. The higher refresh rate improves motion smoothness, how fluid movement looks on screen, but it does not change pixel density or sharpness.
To achieve the clearer visuals you are expecting on a larger monitor, the resolution itself would need to be higher, for example QHD or 4K on a 27-inch display.
Because of this, the Dell S2725H is not defective or of poor quality. It is functioning exactly as designed and advertised. The difference lies in the technical characteristics of resolution compared to screen size.

FirstShop
FirstShop's reply22 Aug 2025, 10:40
Official
 For a useful visual explanation of this concept, you may find this video helpful:  https://youtu.be/o6kWpXFDpco
BvdM
Bennie van der Merwe's update22 Aug 2025, 11:53
Reviewer Update
The problem which you, or the AI you are using, cannot seem to understand is that the characters on the screen is not sharp and crisp. Not at all. The 10 less pixels per inch between the 27" monitor and a 24" monitor would perhaps result in sightly smoother character boundaries, but the 100Hz refresh rate of the new 27" monitor MUST result in a clearer and more crisp character display, especially when compared to my 7 year old, same brand, older technology, 60Hz monitor. BUT it does not.This is a quality issue and I am not satisfied. Please stop harping on about the Pixels Per Inch issue! I brought the PPI up in my first email stating that I requested a swapout of the graphics card and monitor bought for the smaller 24" UltraSharp monitor which has 120Hz refresh rate, but still the same resolution, and saying this should result in a much better viewing experience. Then you saw my pics and freaked out!
FirstShop
FirstShop's reply25 Aug 2025, 11:28
Official
Hi Bennie, 

Thank you for your reply. We want to make sure this is explained as clearly as possible.
There are two separate factors that affect what you see on a monitor


  1. Pixel density (PPI) – This is what controls how sharp and crisp text and fine details look. Both your old 24-inch monitor and the new 27-inch Dell S2725H have the same resolution of 1920 × 1080, which means both have about 2 million pixels in total. The difference is that on a 24-inch screen those 2 million pixels are packed into a smaller space, so each pixel is smaller and sits closer to the next. On a 27-inch screen those same 2 million pixels are spread out over a larger surface, so each pixel is physically bigger and the gaps between them are wider. This is why text and characters appear sharper on a 24-inch monitor and softer on a 27-inch monitor, even though the resolution number is the same.
  2. Refresh rate (Hz) – This only controls how smoothly the screen refreshes when things are moving, such as scrolling or animations. A higher refresh rate makes movement look smoother, but it does not change the sharpness of still text or images.
To put it simply: a 27-inch Full HD monitor will always look less sharp than a 24-inch Full HD monitor, because the pixels are larger and further apart. The refresh rate cannot compensate for this, it only affects motion smoothness.This means the Dell S2725H is performing exactly as designed and advertised: it is a 27-inch Full HD IPS monitor running at 100Hz. For the clearer text you are looking for on a 27-inch display, the resolution would need to be higher (QHD or 4K).We hope this clears up the technical point. The monitor is not defective or of poor quality; it is working exactly to specification.

On paper “10 pixels per inch” doesn’t sound like much, but in practice it makes a very visible difference, especially for text.Here’s why:
  • A 24-inch 1080p monitor has ~93 pixels packed into every inch of screen.
  • A 27-inch 1080p monitor has ~82 pixels per inch.
That’s roughly a 12% drop in pixel density.On text and fine details:
  • At 93 PPI, each letter is made up of smaller, tighter pixels, so edges look sharper and more defined.
  • At 82 PPI, each pixel is larger, so edges look softer, with more visible “stepping” or blur at the boundaries.
Think of it like printing a photo: printing the same image on A4 vs A3 paper without adding extra dots. On the bigger page, the dots are larger and more noticeable, so the picture looks less sharp.Even though it’s “just 10 PPI,” across the whole screen it adds up: a 27-inch 1080p monitor has to stretch the same ~2 million pixels over a larger surface. That stretch what you are seeing described as “worse clarity.”



I want to mention that I am a gamer in my spare time and quite tech savvy, I have used many monitors in my time using computers. The issue you are experiencing will happen no matter what brand when using 1080P resolution on a monitor larger than 24 inch, the text will always seem pixelated. The ideal size monitor for 1080p resolution is 24 inch to keep crisp fonts. There are a couple of settings you can adjust in windows to improve text clarity, search clear type text in the start menu and run the wizard. Also look in advanced system settings under performance settings, look for a selection box called smooth edges of screen fonts.

BvdM
Bennie van der Merwe's update25 Aug 2025, 11:54
Reviewer Update
Here are some answers from AI's on the internet: Claude, Grok4, and ChatGPT on the simple question:
Which is better for coding, circuit design and documentation, and why? The Dell S2725H or the Dell SE2416H.

My Findings:
I found the below answers not to be true for the Dell S2725H monitor you sent me. I compared both old and new monitors side by side, plugged into the same new GT730 graphics card.

Hence my request to swap out for a better 120Hz monitor, or a Refund.

Answers to the question asked above:
ChatGPT:
Final Recommendation
  • Choose the Dell S2725H if you prioritize screen real estate, smoother visuals, better ergonomics, eye comfort, and multimedia convenience. It's especially well-suited to extended coding sessions, detailed documentation, and creative workflows like circuit design.
  • Choose the Dell SE2416H if you're limited by budget or desk space and just need a standard, reliable IPS display.


Grok4:
The Dell S2725H is better for coding, circuit design, and documentation because:
  • Larger 27-inch screen vs. 23.8-inch on SE2416H provides more workspace.
  • 100Hz refresh rate vs. 60Hz reduces eye strain.
  • Better brightness (300 cd/m²), contrast (1500:1), and 99% sRGB for details.

Claude Sonner 4:
The Dell S2725H is significantly better for your needs. Here's why: Key Differences: Screen Size & Real Estate: The larger 27" screen provides substantially more workspace, which is crucial for coding (multiple files/panels), circuit design (detailed schematics), and documentation work. Display Quality: The S2725H offers better brightness and contrast, providing clearer text and better visibility for detailed work. Refresh Rate: Higher refresh rates reduce eye strain during long coding sessions. Color Accuracy: Better color accuracy is important for circuit design software and technical documentation. Why the S2725H is Better for Your Work:
  1. Coding: The 27" screen allows for comfortable side-by-side code editors, terminal windows, and browser testing. The higher refresh rate reduces eye fatigue during long coding sessions.
  2. Circuit Design: More screen real estate means you can view detailed schematics at comfortable zoom levels while keeping toolbars and component libraries visible. Better contrast helps distinguish fine circuit traces.
  3. Documentation: Larger screen accommodates full-page document views alongside reference materials. Better brightness and contrast improve text readability.
  4. Modern Features: The S2725H includes integrated dual 5W speakers Amazon.com: Dell S2725HS 27 Inch Monitor, FHD (1920x1080) Display, 100Hz Refresh Rate, 1500:1 Contrast Ratio, TÜV Rheinland Eye Comfort 4 Star, Integrated 2x5W Speaker, Height/Tilt/Swivel/Pivot- Ash White Color : Electronics and better connectivity options.
The S2725H represents a more current generation of monitors with better specifications across the board, making it the clear choice for professional work requiring screen real estate, clarity, and reduced eye strain.
BvdM
Bennie van der Merwe's update25 Aug 2025, 12:12
Reviewer Update
Please try the question yourself on any AI of your choice.

None of the above mentions PPI even once! I originlly mentioned the PPI when I referred to the UltraSharp monitor, saying that would also improve the view quality, BUT the main thing with the UltraSharp is the 120Hz refresh rate which will reduce the eye strain! And not for gaming!

The point being, I expected the monitor and card I bought to be far superior to my current monitor setup. It is not. I suggested a swap out with no loss to you. You have "Easy Return" under every product on your website. You have 5-star ratings for the monitor my company bougth (very recent ones -> 2025). Why have the return option to choose from during the return process: "Poor product quality or not as expected", on your website?
BvdM
Bennie van der Merwe's update26 Aug 2025, 08:01
Reviewer Update
At this time I am waiting on the National Consumer Commission (NCC) to verify my registration. As soon as they do, the documents I have prepared will be submitted.