Lying under Oath to get Review application to labour court approved

28 November 2024

First National Bank

6th floor

Bank City

1 First Place

Cnr Jeppe & Simnonds Street

Johannesburg

2004

Subject: WITHDRAW THE FALSE INFORMATION PROVIDED UNDER OATH

Dear First National Bank

I am writing to you with request that you withdraw the false statements mentioned in your application for a review at the Labour Court. I believe we had a fair arbitration case and the commissioner's ruling must be respected. If the employer was dissatisfied by the fair ruling it is there in your rights to exercise the rights to review the ruling but it is not withing your rights to further give falsely statements about the facts of the case situation to get your review granted. In paragraph 19.6 you lying that your So-Called my Branch knows me very well as she worked with me, that's a lie your So-Called my Branch Manager is based in Maponya branch she hardly even visited Bara branch where I was based, I had a branch controller there which resigned immediately after the made up case against me which still raises questions why suddenly did that manager resigned immediately after that. For your information your So-called my Branch Manager came to Maponya node around September or October 2023, so how come someone who I barely work with for even Six Months you claim to had known me very well. In line 19.6.1 You lying that the External Consultant was visiting occasionally Bara branch whereas he was full time based there in Bara branch and in paragraph 143 of the award the So-Called my Branch Manager couldn't provide evidence or proof that the External Consultant was not in the branch on the day because she's a lier. Line 19.6.2 I asked a copy that I signed to agree on what you saying that I was aware that consultants are not allowed to touch clients phone which you couldn't provide. Line 19.6.3 That system has always had glitches hence there was complaints from consultants that their sales were not credited that was done on the customer device

In paragraph 26.5 as you claimed, have I ever said or admitted in any of my statements that I ever assisted that specified Client or is there anywhere in my statements where I'm mentioning that client's name? On the award paragraph 106 I asked you the email talking about withdrawal of R300 as you claimed she received two emails you couldn't provide that but now you can lie under oath that I admitted.

In paragraph 26.7 why would someone who does not even know me to that extent would out of nowhere would refer me with my surname whereas my name tag has only my name?

Prior my hearing I ask you few things to prepare for the case which you couldn't provide 1. Was the proof that I deleted the message from the clients phone. 2. Proof that I gained financially as you claimed. 3. Proof that I had a client's phone without clients consent. 4. Proof that I had knowledge of what was going on the client's account. 5. Exchanged emails between myself and that resigned branch manager that had prove about IA's. None of this things were given to me. With your attempts to get me to lose the case which never happened.

I just wonder what else you fnb are capable of doing if you can also lie about my salary say I was earning R8269. 79 whereas I was not and you've got my payslips.

That's why even your investigator was shock when I told him that Mr Mathebula was outside to confirm the alleged confession statement proofing that you *****ulently wrote that confession statement by yourselves .

What makes things even worse you even **** about the client being scared to go open a case because I'm dengerous and well connected around bara you said during the Arbitration at the ccma you, and also said you had to hire protection services to protect you from me because I'm dengerous that all proofs your sinistic desperation of trying to get to ruin my reputation and career.

Failure to honor my request for withdrawal of your alleged false statements submitted under oath I will there by feel more defenseless as I am by you not honoring the fair trial award given by commissioner which was that I should be reinstated to my working duties due to insufficient evidence provided by the employer. Therefore I will feel the need to get a public and social opinion about this case having that I don't have a representative lawyer on my defense and I can't afford one. I'm now willing to take this to social media but I can only still try to keep this private if you can start fighting your case with facts but not the false statements.

Thanking you.

Yours sincerely,

Mthokozisi