**********

SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT.

has anyone ever ask themselves, When was the last time one heard, banks paid fines? Anybody? It would probably solve all our problems hey, I mean let's just say, for every account they frozen in error, and was found guilty further then of staff committing *****, and let's say that we're 10 day, at present, anyone seen what I've seen, youde be fleeing the country most likely, but anyway, R200000 for each, s+it loada money right, problem hey, commercial companies take brunt like that, For some reason, so why not BANKS too, right?

Here's 1 reason why, banks would probably go into a financial war, no doubt FNB will win, - should you look at from the following perspective - at the rate they going these days, a Bank like FNB, as ******* as they already are, theyd probably own the account of the authorities and such individuals in those authoritative hierarchy personal accounts and what do you know, the states finances would probably be cleanout overnight.

It's just a matter of time before some weirdos start igniting some unrest as result of having been ****med by FNB, and roits to that unrest nature of liquor stores closed down, if ultimately NOT any Purges... It'll be a day sure to remember, imagine seeing people running in out of a bank, cash flying everywhere. I mean I saw things during the unrest like people running with TVs, one guy wish he could have, but just would just walk on right pass the guy that had, think that would be the same with cash?

... Anyway that's a wrap. Gotta start moving money to digital wallets guys, it ain't safe in a banks no more. Especially not FNB.

THE FOLLOWING IS TESTIMONY TO - FACT(S) WILL ALWAYS TAKE PRESCIDENCE OVER & WILL SEPERATE ITSELF FROM FICTION, SIMILAR TO FAILURE BEING A RESULT OF BAD PLANNING BECAUSE SUCH PLANNING WAS BAD THEREFORE LEAD TO FAILURE, THUS RESULTS ALWAYS FORM PART TO AN AGENDA OF AN OUTCOME, SO WHEN FACTS ARE PRESENTED,AND NOT TAKEN SERIOUSLY, BAD THINGS HAPPEN, THE RESULTS ARE THEN BASED ON SPECULATION OR ASSUMPTION, AND THAT I'M AFRAID IS ULTIMATELY JUST THE UGLY AND HONEST TRUTH, AND THE INEFITABLE PREVAILS.

FOR those of you that don't know, the ****s we currently faced with and witnessing each day, might be happening and is highly and also likely possible, that could be connected serious crime that had taken place sometime back in 2020,when a hacker breached the security systems that allowed to him to gain access to sensitive and personal information 24 million citizens, DATA Resources of the South African Credit Bureau, you however, yet at that time very little told and still to date.Sometime later last year 15 Sep 2021 police apprehended a 26 year old man in possession of ****** data, and conviscated it. Police believe the man was going to sell such to Data to an entity for R4.2 million.

I wouldn't be surprised if that entity is FNB or perhaps received a copy of thereof, and further distributed amongst other unknown entities they've conspires/colludes/engages in x amount of ******* activity/activities with. They've been instructed by National authorities (them amongst/all, other Banks and other financial institutions that provide similar product product/services to take extreme measures in ensuring the safety of their profiles, portfolios and accounts,funds in all account. FNB acknowledges to accept, comply and adhere to, such instruction, which specifically states, ensure that yo mayneed th may ccomminFsthe an the that they need to requires them to providing statically proven record/report of the data breach of any clients affected as a result every 30 days, but are they truly Living up to that promise and obligative duties? They even failed to adher to my instruction which read, "FNB, MAKE YOUR NEXT MOVE YOUR BEST"

So of cause, yes they ****, and made that obvious with too many attempts, and therefor, I was just about having enough thereof, and showed them what a real **** looks like making them reveal they're perfectly capable of doing so. Here's to why...

So surely the desgise behind a name as you mine is for obvious reasons right,which invites inspection, didnt take them to long to figure that out - , they get it right on the money, with the 1st post calling me out by name, " , why, I had my correct cell number deliberately listed there upon creating this hello Peter account right. Post 2 I remove it, typical reaction just like I expected,
Them answer - wants account or ID number which they by now should know, they just ain't getting. And the final blow right to gutt with post number 3, with the cell number still incorrect, of course them now having and are to forced to take a, deeper look that lead them right into the trap...my turf, my rules. Which shows, had someone hacked my hello Peter, ya'll proly thinking, what could they *****, here ain't no money, well guess again, info like the one below, some social engineeringthey full expose and share matters of a confidentiality, and made it seem under false pretense that they conducted the little "KYC" (know your customer) process ligimately like they here, if they could find me hiding behind an email address, surely they must have done so too with a complainant that provide evidence available for me to see, that is him authentically having made such complaint right that I apparently executed a Phishing **** on such persons....but they remain in denial as if no such request was made,and for that, I'll make you ever so sorry you **** in a sworn statement of an email format to the Ombudsman, someone with similar ruling and authoritative power to a judge.. But almost forgot, you guys seem to be couplings too, had apparently removed senders name that while refusing to reply over the why had it been, Consumers Act takes precedence and supercedes POPIA Act since these are ******** matter, any hidden agendas are goina be of any benefit to you ... So A phishing email huh, was that best you thing you come up with? Feel sorry for youAre going to need to do,and were talking 9 of them right, I wonder what bait I used, muddy toenails? That a sh*! load a work, youre going to Need Jesus... Youre guys are Hilarious, best fun I ever had.

Does


FNB (First National Bank)'s reply:19

Jan 2022, 11:53 Good day Mr. ******

Thank you for your posting.

Your complaint was raised with the Banking Ombudsman on the 3 January 2022, kindly liiase with the Ombudsman for banking services to provide the outcome they received from the bank on the 17 January 2022, or raise your objections with them.

OBS Referral Ref | 2*/**-***7330
Date Received | 03 January 2022
Regards,

Hello Peter Complaints Team
Email address: *** Private Reply


FVF.A.I.S VIGILANTE:20 Jan 2022, 10:32Do you mind send linking this to an email for me? It's the nicest thing you can do, if not the last.... I'll see if I can the Intent recipient of this email. Private Reply



FVF.A.I.S VIGILANTE:20 Jan 2022, 11:16You certainly convinced me though, you know the POPIA ACT very well, but did you know, you last message is has gotten ******** already written all over it, Here's why, never greet a person by name, if you ain't sharing yours. More on that, you seem to be oversharing matters of a Confidentiality, since you so confident that it's me you're talking to, why don't you forward me that outcome directly, perhaps that may have been ****. As it you and I both know, it's been tampered with. You don't want to fail this test now do? Or should go public with that


Status

You are hereby lawfully challenged with the following obligations in compliances and further subject, to provide the necessary entities and data subjects as you have made mention of by name to send such communications as requested by relevant data subjects as per the POPIA ACT



Section 5 Rights of data subjects

1. A data subject has the right to have his, her or its personal information processed in accordance with the conditions for the lawful processing of personal information as referred to in Chapter 3, including the right—
   1. to be notified that—
      1. personal information about him, her or it is being collected as provided for in terms of section 18; or
      2. his, her or its personal information has been accessed or acquired by an unauthorised person as provided for in terms of section 22;
   2. to establish whether a responsible party holds personal information of that data subject and to request access to his, her or its personal information as provided for in terms of section 23;
   3. to request, where necessary, the correction, destruction or deletion of his, her or its personal information as provided for in terms of section 24;
   4. to object, on reasonable grounds relating to his, her or its particular situation to the processing of his, her or its personal information as provided for in terms of section 11(3)(a);
   5. to object to the processing of his, her or its personal information—
      1. at any time for purposes of direct marketing in terms of section 11(3)(b); or
      2. in terms of section 69(3)(c);
   6. not to have his, her or its personal information processed for purposes of direct marketing by means of unsolicited electronic communications except as referred to in section 69(1);
   7. not to be subject, under certain circumstances, to a decision which is based solely on the basis of the automated processing of his, her or its personal information intended to provide a profile of such person as provided for in terms of section 71;
   8. to submit a complaint to the Regulator regarding the alleged interference with the protection of the personal information of any data subject or to submit a complaint to the Regulator in respect of a determination of an adjudicator as provided for in terms of section 74; and
   9. to institute civil proceedings regarding the alleged interference with the protection of his, her or its personal information as provided for in section 99.

Failure to respond to all previous correspondence and this message without any justifiable reason, will be used as evidence further charges challenged for the necessary sanctioning of such non-compliance.