FNB in direct contravention of NCR Act section 71

<p>I now agree thatFNB exist to serve its own interests and not customers. Despite ***urance from the CEO and Alan Pearson to come to me before the end of today nothing has happened . See emails bellow.</p> <div>Dear Alan</div> <p>First e-mail</p> <p> </p> <div>As telephonically discussed , his serves to confirm that you will send me the correspondence/letter from FNB IT to EXPERIAN today.</div> <p> </p> <div>Regards</div> <p> </p> <div>Isaac</div> <div> </div> <div>2nd E-mail</div> <div> </div> <div>Dear Alan</div> <p> </p> <div>Your e-mail below is a complete opposite of our telephonic conversation.</div> <p> </p> <div>You promised to send me a letter and or request you sent to Credit Bureaus more especially EXPERIAN where my name is appearing. ( Default judgment FNB One Account )</div> <p> </p> <div>The clearance certificate was issued on the 23 March 2016 and any record should have been amended by 23 April 2016.</div> <p> </p> <div>You continuously told me that you did send the request to credit bureaus to remove my name but e-mail below suggest the opposite .</div> <p> </p> <div>You have not send the re guest at all of which is direct contravention of the NCR act section 71.</div> <p> </p> <div>I trusted you word on that but the e-mail below is complete opposite of what you have been saying and in contravention of NCR Act section 71.</div> <p> </p> <div>Once more could you please forward the request to EXPERIAN</div> <p> </p> <div>I will be liaising with my debt cousnellor as to what would be our second option even if it means going to court</div> <p> </p> <div>Regards</div> <p> </p> <div>Isaac</div> <div> </div> <p> </p> <p> </p>