TR
Tarryn R

1 reviews | Active since Apr 2026

08 Oct 2026, 10:52

******** Parental Alienation, Selective Property Banned & ********** Administrative Practices at Curro Aurora

I am writing this review to publicly expose the severe administrative misconduct, bad-faith communication, and ******** parental exclusion taking place at Curro Aurora Primary School. As a primary contracting party whose signature is on my child's enrollment forms, and as a full joint legal guardian exercising my statutory rights under Section 18 of the Children's Act 38 of 2005, Curro Aurora's management has actively colluded with my ex-partner to restrict my parental involvement. Key Misconduct & ********** Practices: ******** Property Restriction Without Judicial Authority: Curro Aurora's management, led by Joanne Quick, has enforced an "indefinite" property ban against me based purely on unilateral misrepresentations by my ex-partner. The school has completely failed to produce any served High Court Order, interdict, or legal directive authorizing such a ban. Breach of Executive Commitments: Executive Head Trusha Moodley explicitly assured me that the school would follow the official High Court Order "to a tee." Instead, the school is directly violating court orders and statutory laws by enforcing arbitrary internal emails over judicial frameworks. Absurd & Contradictory Access Policies: In an astonishing display of bad faith, Curro Aurora explicitly permits me to attend school concerts and officially invites me on property for the Grade 4 Transition Evening at Cosmic Hall, yet claims I pose a "risk" that prevents me from stepping onto school grounds for a 15-minute in-person Parent-Teacher consultation. This proves the "property ban" is entirely arbitrary, **********, and designed solely to assist in parental alienation. Calculated Notification Delays: Management regularly colludes behind closed doors, processing restrictive measures against me and calculatedly waiting 7 days before notifying me, deliberately withholding context and denying me due process. Unsubstantiated Threats of Expulsion: While the school has made severe, threatening remarks about issuing letters to expel my child, they have consistently failed to provide any formal status updates, documentation, or transparent proceedings to me as a primary contracting guardian. Conclusion: Curro Aurora is actively aiding in parental alienation, overriding statutory parental rights, & enforcing ********** administrative bans without court authority. Full audio recordings of administrative meetings, complete email audit trails, and documented evidence of their bad-faith conduct are being uploaded to CaseLines (Case No: ***) and submitted to educational oversight bodies. Parents need to be aware of how this institution treats devoted mothers who stand up for their lawful rights.

0
Replies (1)
TR
Tarryn R's update08 Oct 2026, 14:13
Reviewer Update
Following my initial public review, Curro Aurora's management (Operational Manager Joanne Quick) sent an email today formally declining my request for an in-person parent-teacher consultation and doubling down on bad-faith administrative gatekeeping. New Developments & Escalated Misconduct: Formal Decline of In-Person Consultation: Despite previously advertising and scheduling parent-teacher consultations as in-person meetings on school grounds, Joanne Quick has officially refused my right to attend an in-person consultation. ******** "Invite-Only" Declaration: Management declared that my physical presence on school grounds is strictly "by invite only"—a policy created internally with zero legal backing, zero court orders, and in direct breach of Executive Head Trusha Moodley's explicit commitment to follow High Court orders "to a tee." Forcing MS Teams Platforms: Management is attempting to mandate an online TEAMS platform after advertising in-person consultations, expecting a parent to set up virtual platform accounts simply to accommodate their ******** physical exclusion. Forcing Direct Negotiation in Active Litigation: In a calculated attempt to isolate herself from accountability, Joanne Quick has commanded that I communicate and negotiate directly with my ex-partner (Mr. Robert Page) to agree on meeting times—completely ignoring active High Court litigation (Case No: 2026/102434) and documented inter-parental conflict. Irreconcilable Contradiction Remains: The school continues to confirm my physical attendance on property for the Grade 4 Transition Evening on 15 October 2026 at Cosmic Hall and permits me at school concerts, yet arbitrarily claims I cannot step onto the same property for an academic consultation. Conclusion: Curro Aurora’s management continues to demonstrate unfair administrative **************, breach of contract, and active cooperation in parental alienation. Every piece of this ongoing correspondence is being uploaded directly to CaseLines under Case No: 2026/102434 as part of the official High Court record.