RN
Richard N
1 reviews | Active since Jun 2014
10 Sept 2026, 13:48
You may as well use Claude for adjudication
Adjudicator had gotten material facts to a dispute wrong, hallucinated a case and appeared to leverage AI.
Importantly the locus standi of the respondent who is registered against CSOS incorrectly is not considered as a fact to resolve preliminary.
Helpful (0)
Replies (1)0
Replies (1)RN
Richard N's updateReviewer Update
11 Sept 2026, 13:28One more consideration - https://csos.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/HOA-Mixed-Use-Scheme-Developments-Presentation-Durban.pdf
CSOS appears to have no clue what an incorporated association is in terms of by-law. They accept constitutions without any extended verification. This is very disappointing for a body whose mandate is legislated however the court apparently does not know its own law in this case.
CSOS appears to have no clue what an incorporated association is in terms of by-law. They accept constitutions without any extended verification. This is very disappointing for a body whose mandate is legislated however the court apparently does not know its own law in this case.
RN
Richard N's update11 Sept 2026, 13:28
Reviewer Update
One more consideration - https://csos.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/HOA-Mixed-Use-Scheme-Developments-Presentation-Durban.pdf
CSOS appears to have no clue what an incorporated association is in terms of by-law. They accept constitutions without any extended verification. This is very disappointing for a body whose mandate is legislated however the court apparently does not know its own law in this case.
CSOS appears to have no clue what an incorporated association is in terms of by-law. They accept constitutions without any extended verification. This is very disappointing for a body whose mandate is legislated however the court apparently does not know its own law in this case.