LA
Linda A

1 reviews | Active since Jun 2010

21 Aug 2018, 16:05

You think you are covered for a serious accident - think again!

My husband and I are healthy; no chronic conditions and rarely sick. Like many people, we have Medical Aid because we want the reassurance that we are covered if the worst should happen. If you are the same, you are not going to like what I have to tell.

The worst did happen in May last year. My husband had a serious accident. He suffered multiple fractures and had to be rushed to hospital for immediate treatment and emergency surgery. He almost lost his leg. It was a terrible time but he pulled through and started the long road to recovery. Then the bills started coming. I'd estimate that the Medical Aid had paid maybe 20-30% of the bills and left us with over R300,000 to pay. They had either rejected or short paid most of the in-hospital bills.

Over the next six months, in between caring for my husband and trying to keep my business going, I started the process of querying the claims. Some I managed to get paid but others they flat out refused, including the extremely expensive external bone fixation device that alone cost more than R100,000. I had to get the Council for Medical Schemes involved. And here's the thing, after 6 months of daily queries and a ridiculous runaround from Bonitas, it took just one e-mail from the Council for Medical Schemes, asking for a justification for refusing the claims and Bonitas just paid up. There wasn't even a hearing or an investigation. THEY KNEW. They knew they were in the wrong and didn't have a legal leg to stand on. And this is what makes me utterly furious. Bonitas knew they were in the wrong but just hoped that if they held out long enough, I would just give up.

I'm still struggling to get subsequent claims paid and there is always a ridiculous reason. Sometimes they ignore the PMB codes on the statements, sometimes they capture the wrong information and sometimes they try to avoid paying by saying that there is no authorisation despite there being an approved PMB treatment plan in place. Getting a claim paid is like trying to get blood out of a stone.

The truth needs to be told. As a member or prospective member, you don't know how good or bad your medical aid is until you actually need it.

0
Replies (3)
Bonitas Medical Fund
Bonitas Medical Fund's reply22 Aug 2018, 13:26
Official

Hello linda kzn ,

Thank you for submitting your details to us through Hello Peter.

This is to confirm that we have received your information and that we are currently investigating this matter.

Our representative will be in touch with you shortly to discuss this matter and ensure that it is speedily resolved.

Kind regards,

Bonitas Team

Bonitas Medical Fund
Bonitas Medical Fund's reply27 Aug 2018, 12:40
Official

Hello linda kzn ,

Thank you for submitting your details to us through Hello Peter.

This is to confirm that we have received your information and that we are still currently investigating this matter.

Kind regards,

Bonitas Team

LA
Linda A's update27 Aug 2018, 13:17
Reviewer Update
I'm investigating too. Here's an extract from the Code of Conduct in Respect of PMB Benefits (31 July 2010) which was ratified by all Medical Schemes and government. As per the guidelines below, Bonitas is not automatically triggering payment for PMB's based on ICD 10 codes, in fact your system is actively preventing payment of valid PMB claims. Do you dispute this? Part V Processing of PMB claims 13. Schemes must capture all submitted ICD10 codes and where a valid PMB ICD10 code is submitted, this must act as a trigger for potential payment from the PMB benefit, as required in paragraph 14 below. 14. Medical scheme claims-processing systems must, where applicable, automatically pay valid PMB claims from risk pools (not medical savings accounts or other benefits), based on the availability of valid clinical codes and pre-authorisation or registration information, which in turn is subject to subject to benefit definitions (see paragraph 4, Part III, page 5)