ABSA COMMITS *****

DISCOVERY EVER PAIDOUT MY CAR THAT WAS DAMAGED BY THE SUSPECT, AND THE BANK TOOK THE CAR *******LY AND SOLD IT *******LY, THIS IS DISCOVERY'S FAULT AND NOW I AM WITH AN R50,000.00 ON ITC DUE TO THE BANK JUST SOLD THE CAR AS DISCOVERY DID NOT PAY OR TOOK THE CAR AND DISCOVERY ACTED **********LY NOT REPLACING A DAMAGED CAR THAT WAS AS A NEW CAR 4AND1/2 MONTHS OLDER, AS THEY SHPULD HAVE BUT **********LY TRIED TO DO REPAIRS TO THIS 4MONTH OLD CAR, THEREFOR THE BANK AND I WAS AWAITING THAT REPLACEMENT AND IT WAS SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN IMMEDIATELY AT REPORT OF DAMAGE AND THERE IS A ******** CASE AGAIN 663/12/2018 AND THERE WAS A ******** CASE 313/10/2015 WITH THE START OF THIS DAMAGES AND ******* USE OF SUCH CAR.

WORST OF ALL WESBANK FINANCED THIS SAME CAR NEW AND 2DAYS AFTER PURCHASE THIS CAR HAD AN UNDERLYING DEFECT, SO BAD THAT IT CONTINIOUSLY PARKED OFF NEXT TO THE ROAD ASOF DAY 2, THE DEALER WHOM INCONNECTION WITH WESBANK HAD ALL INFO FOR WESBANK THE DAMAGE ON THEIR INFORMATION SYSTEM BUT WESBANK REFUSED TO CANCELL THEIR CO TRACT HOPING THE DEALER WILL SORT THIS OUT, BUT ACCORDING TO MY KNOWLEDGE AND TO WESBANKCONTRACT THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND THE BANK AGREEMENT IS CANCELLED IMMEDIATELY WHEN THERE IS AN UNDELYING DEFECT AS THAT CAR HAD, AND THE CONSUMER ACT PROTECTS ME AND I THEIR CONTRACTS WESBANK AND THE DEALER SALE AGREEMENT IT SAYS THAT IF SUCH INCIDENT HAPPENS ""DEFECT AS THE CAR IS SOLD FREE OF DEFECTS" THE CONTRACT O THE SAID CAR WILL TERMINATE IMMEDIATELY AND IT SHOULD BE REPLACED ON A NEW FINANCE AGREEMENT AND NEW CONTRACT, WHICH WASNT DONE. THEY WERE SP BAD BOTH PARTIES THAT THEY EXPECTED AN INSURANCE TO COVER THIS DEFECTED CAR, WHEREBY THIS INSURANCE HAS RIGHTS TOO, AND EVEN IF THIS DISCOVERY WAS INFORMED THEY TOO CARRIED ON ASIF NOTHING HAPPENED, INSURING A DEFECTIVE CAR, MY QUESTION IS IF DISCOVERY KNEW THEY INSURED A DEFECTIVE CAR WASTHE INSURANCE CORRECT IN KEEPING IT INSURED? AND IF SO WHY DO THE INSURANCE NOT REPLACE MY CAR AT YHE TIME 1 WEEK AFTER I REPORTED THE 4MO TH OLD DAMAGED CAR. THE BANK AND THE INSURANCE SAY THAT IN THE CONTRACTA THAT THEY REPLACE IMMEDIATELY IF A DA,AGE IS DONE BEFORE 6MONTHS, WHY DID WESBANK, DISCOVERY DO THIS ******* ACTION OF NOT DOING SO? AT THE TIME MY ACCOUNT WAS PAID UP TO DATE WITH DISCOVERY AND WITH WESBANK, WHEN I SAW I AM BEING **********LY TREATED BY WESBANK AND DISCOVERY I CHOSE NOT TO PAY THIS CAR ANY MORE, AND ALSO I STOPED FOR A NEXT REASON NOT TO PAY AN DEFECTIVE CAR ANY MORE.

DISCOVERY NOT REPLACING LEFT ME WITH MORE DAMAGES, AS I THEN TRIED TO BUY ANOTHER CAR.

IN ALL THIS TIME I THEN TRIED TO BUY A CAR WITH ABSA, BECAUSE I NEEDED AN CAR AND COULD NOT USE THE CAT OF WESBANK DUE TO ITS DEFECT AND ITS DAMAGE, AND BY ANY MISTAKE OF HYUNDAY KNYSNA THEY TOO SOLD A DEFECTIVE CAR TO ME, AND THIS CAR HAD ALSO ON THE 1ST DAY AN ENGINLIGHT COMING ON BUT KOBUS OF HYUNDAY NEVER REPLACED THIS CAR, AND I INFORMED ABSA THE UNDERLYING DEFECT AND THAT THEIR FINANCE CONTRACT TERMINATES IMMEDIATELY AS THIS IS SAID ON THEIR FINANCE AGREEMENT DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE SALE OF THE CAR IS NOT WHAT THEY FINANCE, THIS MISLEADING DEFECT WAS AN FALSLY CLEARANCE OF THE FAULT REPORT BY MERCEDEZBENZ GEORGE AND THEREFOR THE DEALER MANAGER KOBUS DID NOT KNOW OF THE FAULT, THIS INFORMATION WAS GIVEN TO KOBUS HYUNDAY MANAGER THAT THE FAULT REPORT WAS CLEARED BY SERVICE OF THE MERC. AND THAT ONLY IF A LONGDISTANCE DRIVE IS DONE THE FAULT REPORT WILL APPEAR AGAIN, IT WAS THEREFORE NOT A NKOWN DEFECT BY DEALER HYUNDAI MYSELF AND THE ABSA DUE TO MERCEDESBENZ GEORGE *****. BUT ID DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE CONTRACT BETWEEN MYSELF AND HYUNDAY AND ABSA STAY INPLACE, ON CONSUMER ACT IT MEANS THAT THE DEALER AGREEMENT AND BANK AGREE,NET WITH MYSELF IMMEDIATELY BECOMES NUL AND THEREFORE I THEN DID GIVE THIS CAR TO HYUNDAY, WHERE IT WAS ****** BY SOME ONE AND ABSA BANK **********LY STOLE THIS CAR FROM POLICE OFFICER WITH A LIE STATING THEY DEPEND ON THE CONTRACT WICH IS A NON EXISTING CONTRACT.