1 reviews | Active since Jun 2021
Lies and propaganda
Headline "Clickbait" from their website reads: "Sahpra says Sputnik V vaccine not going to be approved for use in South Africa" Then at the body of the article is just propaganda script about Gauteng premier. Just Visiting SAHPRA website and reading(downloading the PDF) their statement from yesterday 15 Oct about the "review process for SputnicV, They raise some concerns but still stating that they are awaiting more info from the local manufacturer and the review process still continuing.. Nowhere in their official repost states that they WILL NOT approve SputnicV. Now this is blatant lie and misleading any one that awaits alternative vaccine that was approved in too many other countries, In Africa aswell as Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, not to mention Russia, Andora, Hungary, Seems like all those countries are less scientifically, educated or don care about their citizens.. Reading the SAHPRA statement: at the end it stated:
"Following the consultation with local and international scientific experts and after considering all the available data, including review of the dossier submitted by Lamar International (Pty) Ltd, SAHPRA resolved that: 1. The Section 21 application for Sputnik V by Lamar international Pty (Ltd) not be approved at this time. SAHPRA is concerned that use of the Sputnik V vaccine in South African, a setting of a high HIV prevalence and incidence, may increase the risk of vaccinated males acquiring HIV. 2. The rolling review of the Sputnik V vaccine will, however, remain open for submission of relevant safety data in support of the application. SAHPRA notes media reports that applications for the approval of the Ad26-vectored component only (denoted as Sputnik Light) are expected to be submitted to a number of national medicines regulatory authorities. SAHPRA has not yet received an application for Sputnik Light. Issued by: Dr Boitumelo Semete "
Now point 2 says : 2. The rolling review of the Sputnik V vaccine will, however, remain open for submission of relevant safety data in support of the application. Which is completely opposite than what 702 propaganda misleading the public, It clearly says that the SAHPRA is remaining OPEN for submissions of safety data.
On other note a banner on SABC reads that SutnikV CAUSES HIV which is another blatant lie from another propaganda network. Same document from SAHPRA states that the concerns are about the "Adenovirus Type 26 (Ad26) and the other on Adenovirus Type 5 (Ad5), as the delivery vehicles for the antigen" This "delivery Veghicles aparently was used in trial HIV vaccine and so far proved NOT TO prevent HIV when tested in *** men ,and hetero***ual couples in Africa. This does not mean that it CAUSES HIV, just not effective against it, And as SputnikV was never clamed to be HIV vaccine, the argument does not hold water, but SAHPRA still "delaying" what can be life saving and to curb vaccine hesitancy..
